and m1a2c with APS
and they couls still unnerf the hstvl and put it at an higher br
dont even bother arguing. you can make a point for any nato vehicle to be in most nato countries as they share technology and developments with other companies based out of other countries.
Again, they were separate projects prior, following this logic would give Black Night 1500HP also. HAAIP upgrades are being applied to CR2s from 2022 onwards.
That6is where you will look 70%of the time
Germany has the Swiss hunter which doesnt belong there, why are you dying on this stupid hill
then take it out ohh wait none of us make the decisions so just chill
I do not have a will to explain this. Someone who knows might take it from here
So take him away, what’s your problem?
and now imagine in the devstream we see the bmpt 72 lmaooo
Any news on dev stream?
you are the problem.
tomorrow that’s for certain
Ok are we all going yeah T90 needs to be in Britain No
Just that British tank shouldn’t be in the German tree cause a gun
The same as German tank shouldn’t be in the British tree due to its gun
Switzerland will be like that for Germany, it’s a matter of time. Or were you supposed to have the whole of Switzerland allocated to you?
He-he, don’t like it when people point out double standards?
To be fair the SEPv2 also isn’t the best US Abrams variant. We still have the SEPv3, v4 prototype and if we wait enough the M1E3.
Gaijin just made a bit of a strange choice by using the SEPv2 as the 2A7V counterpart. Maybe they have some different hull armor estimates that they plan to use for it.
Either that, or their track record for unbalanced new ground ranks continues.
Switzerland should be allocated to an Alps tree
From a 2021 article on the British Army website:
“A number of automotive upgrades will be made to existing in-service Challenger 2 tanks to increase their stability and mobility…”
Do we even have it? To add it there)