I know almost nobody likes the M901, but I personally find it a good vehicle to practice positioning with. That aside, my only question is this:
Why?
What exactly wrong?
1 Like
Theyre both entirely different vehicles, just because Bradley has a tow does not make it comparable to Wall-E
Okay, let me rephrase it in a way you might be able to understand.
When going in to an 8.3 BR battle, which will you pick? The M901 with only 2 TOWs at 8.3 and that’s it, or do you go with the Bradley that has 2 TOWs and the Bushmaster (which also gives it limited AA abilities). It’d be like putting the Chaparral and LAV-AD at the same BR.
You pick the Bradley of course, the Wall-E as backup but there’s many lineups like this. Another example is the Warrior and Striker. Or the RakJpz2 and Marder 1A3. IT-1 and BMP-2.
Don’t know why you think the US tree deserves special treatment in this regard… what next? put the Abrams in 1.0br?
2 Likes
They’re all over the place.
1 Like
M901 is a better TD anyway, it gets I-TOW instead of normal TOW, and it is also very good hull down as long as nobody hits you with HE.
Oh look, a soviet main coming into a post about a US vehicle and talking shit, that’s not stereotypical at all. Thanks for the engagement though, i appreciate it even if you had nothing worthwhile to say.
1 Like
The M-901’s entire purpose was to be an I-TOW carrier…
It’s got a “remote” weapons station, and can fire hull down, but the Bradley can not, and it has the Bushmaster.
It evenly balances out, that’s why.
(Btw, yes, I am agreeing with you, should have specified, this was an explanation to the OP)
2 Likes
I like it…
Why do you think Wall-E deserves to suck?
I’d take an M551 as backup before I’d take an M901. The only map it’s actually good on is Fulda bc the castle.
1 Like
Justice for Wall-E! althought the m551 is quite good as well I would rather have both available (plus m901 gets thermals)
I think all the ATGM carriers suck and need a rebalancing. They rarely provide any advantage over conventional tanks which can send their rounds flying at 1000m/s. Especially the swingfire which can’t even swing its missiles
So M901 SHOULD get a BR adjustment?
Well, if you want to look at it that way… I’d rather they rework the guidance systems, so that the missiles don’t have guidance as bad a drunk 3am piss stream, and for them to stop nerfing the post pen because of malding heavy tank players.
It’s more nuanced than just bumping down the BR of the USA missile carrier and leaving the rest in the dust. To everyone - I am merely presenting facts and the “Russia main” excuse does not work on me because I don’t touch a single Russian vehicle, I have no desire to play them.
Boo hoo, I’m crying inside. Anyways, thank you too for stating the obvious about a joke.
When the facts are irrefutable, a shocking amount of people turn to ad hominem. God forbid if I tried to present the facts whilst having 1 battle in a Russian vehicle on my profile.