M3A3 should go down in BR?

So long back in time, it was one of my favourites, but now, it seems really bad at the moment, TOW 2B its not as it was then, standard TOW its almost useless as 80% of your enemies has ERA, and how the hell it have same BR as 2S38???

10 Likes

a fair few IFV around that br could use a bit of reshuffeling but by far the worst of currently from a statcard perspective is the Desert Warrior which is the same br as the bradley while lacking in most fields of mobility

It’s not the same BR. It’s a 0.3 BR difference, and if you want the M3A3 Bradley to go down, others will go too, Gaijin rarely makes BR changes for a single vehicle.

It is hilarious that the BMP-2M and 2S38 are basically the same BR as the Bradley. None of the bradleys should be higher than 9.7.

5 Likes

Or at least do something with does TOW 2B, now in game they work as heat, but in fact its EFP charge

2 Likes

Puma at an even higher BR with no missiles-
Hell the Bagel would be only .3 lower with I-TOW

Not true the m3a3 performed terrible compare to puma. It’s slow, it’s big and the tow 2b is pretty useless again the Russian tanks

1 Like

How about do something with TOW-2B instead? i would love it

1 Like

then use the TOW-2A instead, you’re not limited to the 2B

I don’t even understand how Bradley can be on the same ballistic missile with 2S38. Besides the fact that the Bradley has dimensions larger than the 2S38, the Bradley gun has three times less penetration than the 2S38.

1 Like

Rockets? What other missiles? TOW-2A and B are not missiles, they are paper bullets.
At some point I stopped taking them altogether. Because they are useless. Firstly, to launch you need to stop and wait for the rocket launcher to open, then launch the rocket and guide it first up and then towards the target, otherwise it will crash into the ground. And fourthly, Puma is much faster than Bradley, has armor, has protection from missiles and has survivability.

1 Like

A thing with similar mobility. Trading sheer gun firepower for TOW missiles. Plus you have TDA 2B’s. Much more survivable.

Yeah, makes sense to me.

In my experience using TOW-2As they have been amazing.

They are useless.

1 Like

How are they useless? 80% of the time I hit someone with them it kills them (90% for russian tanks).

The rocket is very slow and it is not a fact that you will have time to launch it. In 90% of cases I did not have time to use it.

Then your playing the tank wrong. It is your fault for putting yourself in a situation where you dont have time to use it.

1 Like

That’s a stupid argument. A tiger can theoretically kill an abrams if you position yourself right. Mobility and the ability to quickly use your weapons are important- just like stabilizers.

All tanks have drawbacks to them, just like how the Bradley cannot fire on the move. Some situations you will just be screwed and it could not have been your fault, but that goes for all vehicles. Maybe don’t spawn your Bradley on a brawling map where you need to be able to fire on the move. Not all vehicles work on all maps/situations. The key is to know when you should spawn in the Bradley (not a brawling map) and put yourself into situations where you will do good (sniping, firing tows while hull down, flanking).

1 Like

That is true. However, just because a tank is situationally useful does not mean that it deserves its BR. Virtually all tanks are situationally useful at every BR. Even in situations in which the Bradley is strong (aka hull down sniping), there are simply better options.

The bradley is too situational to justify its current BR.