thatz is right and i was wrong possibly the best source i got for this is wiki
is wikipedia allowed as a reliable source?
It can be used as a source as it would still be a secondary source:
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/rules-guidelines-tips-for-creating-suggestions-check-before-creating-a-new-suggestion/411/2
With adding this they could also add whatever this ERA is called for the BMP-3 in the same update
1 Like
i mean thats cool but also pretty bad. if im correct the testing for this resulted in 6 era blocks getting detonated by a single pg7v. and even if implemented if im not wrong its basically just contact 1. so you get 3 tons for contact 1
That’s Karkas-I with 4S20 inserts from Kontact-1. It had a lot of issues during testing as mentioned above. There’s a modern version of Karkas called Karkas-II which uses 4S24 inserts. This version is seen in-game on the turret of the T-90M/T-72B3/T-80BVM on the sides and rear. IRL this version is used on the BMP-3:
Honestly I only want BUSK and this on the BMP-3 because I like the way they look. Bradley looks good with BUSK and the BMP-3 looks like a goofy guy
1 Like
we need this +1
used is a bit of an overstatement, i dont think iver ever seen a single bmp 3 go in combat with an armor package, tho that is pretty irrelevant for war thunder sake
There’s quite a few that have. Many have been found on Oryx’s database.
i havent seen any yet personally, though russia is starting to mostly transition to those as their bmp 2 inventory gets thinner and thinner, so we might start seeing more protection packages going forward.
1 Like