thatz is right and i was wrong possibly the best source i got for this is wiki
is wikipedia allowed as a reliable source?
It can be used as a source as it would still be a secondary source:
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/rules-guidelines-tips-for-creating-suggestions-check-before-creating-a-new-suggestion/411/2
With adding this they could also add whatever this ERA is called for the BMP-3 in the same update
i mean thats cool but also pretty bad. if im correct the testing for this resulted in 6 era blocks getting detonated by a single pg7v. and even if implemented if im not wrong its basically just contact 1. so you get 3 tons for contact 1
That’s Karkas-I with 4S20 inserts from Kontact-1. It had a lot of issues during testing as mentioned above. There’s a modern version of Karkas called Karkas-II which uses 4S24 inserts. This version is seen in-game on the turret of the T-90M/T-72B3/T-80BVM on the sides and rear. IRL this version is used on the BMP-3:
Honestly I only want BUSK and this on the BMP-3 because I like the way they look. Bradley looks good with BUSK and the BMP-3 looks like a goofy guy
we need this +1
used is a bit of an overstatement, i dont think iver ever seen a single bmp 3 go in combat with an armor package, tho that is pretty irrelevant for war thunder sake
There’s quite a few that have. Many have been found on Oryx’s database.
i havent seen any yet personally, though russia is starting to mostly transition to those as their bmp 2 inventory gets thinner and thinner, so we might start seeing more protection packages going forward.
I’d love to see this ingame, anything new for america really would be nice because of how bad a state top tier ground is for it right now