M3A3 Bradley, BR discussion

Today I decided to play the Bradley and deeply regretted it.
His TOW-2Bs no longer do any damage. Everyone kills him with shots to the turret or launcher. I’ve never survived a single hit. Any shell, any bullet, just blows me away.
Uploading: War Thunder 2025.12.07 - 21.04.51.38.mp4…


1 Like

Yeah it’s pretty garbage

1 Like

True but the warrior is pretty much a worse bradley

I disagree

youre wrong, not much else to say, it doesnt fit the meta in the slightest, and the only real unique ability it has is gimped.

2 Likes

eww they nerfed it?? Cuz that looks silly to do.

in real life, does USA have any other MBTs than the Abrams? that are in active service?

Its also slower, has worse gun handling, lacks CITV and is stuck with the garbage PMB 090 export round. Only benefit the Desert Warrior has over the M3 Bradley is the always-deployed launchers and full reverse gear.

They are basically equally shit at the br but the Bradley definitely better considering you can actually side pen MBTs unlike the Desert Warrior.

Why do you think the Abrams is called a Main Battle Tank?

1 Like

What does this have to do with his question?

I can’t wait for the Gaijins to start adding new IFVs and APCs for the USA and not just for the USSR and Europe.

No.

I wasn’t answering you.

I don’t think you understand how a public forum works.

why do you think a T72 is called a main battle tank or a T80 is called a main battle tank or a T90 called a main battle tank or a T14 called a main battle tank… mate a nation can have more than 1 MBT

Yes, Russia formally has a MBT, but in fact it is not a single tank, but a family of incompatible vehicles that are only called “MBT” due to the classification tradition, and not due to any real uniformity.

your point?

Anyway

I don’t care

alright

1 Like