M3A1 Stuart - Leased Light Armor

Would you like to see the Soviet M3A1 added?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg M3A1 Stuart - Leased Light Armor

Introduction
The Soviet M3A1 Stuart was a light tank supplied to the Soviet Union through the U.S. Lend-Lease program during World War II. Originating from the United States, this tank was known for its speed, agility, and reliability. Armed with a 37mm gun and capable of reaching speeds up to 58 km/h, it was well-suited for reconnaissance and hit-and-run tactics. However, its light armor made it vulnerable in direct combat against German tanks. Despite its limitations, the M3A1 played a significant role in bolstering Soviet armored forces during critical phases of the war, particularly in the early stages of the conflict.


History
The M3A1 Stuart, developed in the United States during the late 1930s, saw service in World War II as a versatile light tank, with its history spanning early engagements in North Africa, its delivery to Allied nations like the Soviet Union through the Lend-Lease program, and its use in reconnaissance roles despite its vulnerability to heavier Axis armor, ultimately proving instrumental in various theaters of war as a reliable and maneuverable asset.

Soviet M3A1 Stuart History
“The Soviet Union’s adoption of the M3A1 Stuart light tank, supplied through the U.S. Lend-Lease program during World War II, marked an important aspect of international cooperation as the tank, originally designed for mobility and speed rather than heavy combat, was integrated into the Red Army’s forces primarily for reconnaissance and support roles, where its 37mm gun, modest armor, and reliable engine made it useful in specific scenarios such as probing enemy positions, escorting convoys, or filling gaps in Soviet armored divisions during critical early stages of the war when the Soviet Union was rebuilding its tank fleet after devastating initial losses, yet the Stuart’s limited firepower and inability to withstand hits from heavier German tanks like the Panzer IV and Tiger I rendered it ineffective in direct combat, leading the Red Army to employ the vehicle more sparingly on the frontlines and increasingly relegate it to secondary duties or training purposes as the war progressed and Soviet-designed tanks like the T-34 and KV series became more widely available, highlighting both the tank’s contribution to sustaining Soviet operations during a period of need and its eventual obsolescence in the face of evolving wartime demands and technological advancements, ultimately underscoring how the M3A1 Stuart, though modest in its impact compared to other vehicles, represented a lifeline of Allied support that bolstered Soviet resilience and showcased the strategic importance of shared resources and collaboration among the Allied powers in their collective effort to defeat Axis forces.”


Specification

General Information

  • Origin: United States
  • USSR Received: 1,233
  • Crew: 4
  • Weight: 12.7 tons

Dimensions

  • Length: 4.5 m (14.8 ft)
  • Width: 2.24 m (7.3 ft)
  • Height: 2.31 m (7.6 ft)

Armaments

  • Primary: 37 mm M6 gun
  • Secondary:
    • 1 × .30 caliber M1919 Browning machine gun (coaxial)
    • 1 × .30 caliber M1919 Browning machine gun (hull-mounted)
    • 1 × .30 caliber M1919 Browning machine gun (anti-aircraft)

Armor

  • Thickness: 13–51 mm

Engine and Performance

  • Engine: Continental W-670-9A 7-cylinder radial gasoline engine
  • Horsepower: 250 hp
  • Power-to-Weight Ratio: 20 hp/ton
  • Top Speed: 58 km/h (36 mph) on roads
  • Range: 112–145 km

image

Images

image



Sources

M3 Stuart - Wikipedia
Walk Around: M3 Stuart Tank – The Armourers Bench
Soviet M3A1 Stuart, М3 лёгкий - Eastern Front | World War Photos
https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/k86gq9/a_soviet_lend_lease_m3_stuart_and_her_crew_in/

+1. This would make a great addition to complement a lineup with the SU-57, T-28E, and others at a BR of 2.3. Any suggestions for Soviet lend-lease vehicles have my support.

2 Likes

-1 Russia does not need more copy paste

1 Like

I bet you could probably make an entire tech tree out of lend lease vehicles for the USSR. AT least up until rank 3-4.

I was thinking perhaps one of those bundles like we saw last update. Including a Matilda II Mk IV, M17 and perhaps a Churchill or Stuart? Get a bulk of them out of the way just like that.

3 Likes

Absolutely, I think this is an excellent idea. I don’t see any downside to it, and you’ve got my full support on your proposal.

4 Likes

this wasn’t already in the USSR tree?! +1

1 Like

Still debating on making a Stuart M5A1 post, only 5 were ever delivered under the lend lease program.
IMG_8253
One of the five at Kubinka

1 Like

Well, this Stuart variant is definitely suggest-able for the Soviet Union, provided you have the sources to support it. More power to you!

1 Like

it’s not that well documented. They were supposedly delivered on the tail end of the war, mainly used for evaluation. They rejected the delivery of anymore and instead requested more Sherman’s. They couldn’t cheat on their beloved Emcha.

Yes, thankfully it’s not in the USSR tree, and if we’re lucky, it never will be.

why not? Im completely for lend lease and export vehicles going into the tree which makes the most sense, even if its not the native tree for that vehicle.

Copy paste is bad for Warthunder, especially when it isn’t even filling a gap. It’s an extra kick in the balls that it’s a copy paste vehicle from America.

+1!

1 Like

While im usually of that sentiment (indian spaa in the British tree, the like 20 m48s in game or how everyone has a t64/72/80/90 slapped into a tree) when its the main nation of that tree using said vehicle it and it was of big historical significance such as the many vehicles of lend-lease it gets a pass.

Want, please give.

1 Like

It’s still copy paste, and Russia most certainly does not need it. The fact that it’s an American vehicle only makes it worse, as Gajin seems to be on a quest to strip America of every unique vehicle it has.

at least youre getting the vehicles before they go to other nations which have a historical claim to them. Britain didn’t even get Royal Sovereign before it was put into the USSR tree because we lent it to them for ww2

I wouldn’t say Stuart’s are unique man, almost every country on the allied side used them at the time, which is shown ingame, same with Sherman’s

1 Like

its about as unique as a centurion, like a buttload of people used them