So basically you’re just talking nonsense, alright.
3BM60’s penetrator is 650x21. There’s little to no contention on this figure, nor its 735x21 total length.
Whatever floats your boat man.
1 Like
You tried to contest a point that you still had no response to, and the one and only comeback is “prove it”… I’m not going to sit by while you refuse to respond and then ask me to baby-step you through basic information.
Thanks, keep sinking.
Considering the fact you probably haven’t even see the Tula table, do I really need to continue this? No, I don’t.
So far it feels like it’s me who’d have to hand-feed you information.
The “Tula table” shows nothing but one singular length figure for 3BM46, no diameter, no nothing.
Neither 3BM59/60 have figures for projectile dimensions, shot dimensions, shot/projectile weight, or velocity. The only things that are shown are penetration.
You’ve given almost nothing, who’s hand-feeding who?
You just proved me right :)
Cya lad.
1 Like
I proved you right by… disproving your one and only citation?