Internet tough guy and smartass. Proven wrong, still can’t swallow it. I can understand. Meanwhile we’ll wait for Gaijin to correct the Abrams turret ring.
3 Likes
Internet tough guy and smartass.
The irony in this statement given that you were just trying to threaten me to be quiet with some vague threat that you have no grounds to do so with, and your threats to others earlier in this thread with similar threats of false flagging. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
2 Likes
Still wanting the final word? Here, word. You may finish your feeble fight of “I wanna be proven right so let me continue to engage in nasty bitchy behavior until my opp rages”.
1 Like
I’ve been nothing but civil, you’re the one swearing, being toxic and making threats at people constantly. You’re projecting way too much and you’re also derailing the thread once again because all you’re doing is throwing out insults because you can’t handle that you made a mistake.
Hopefully you calm down because this amount of anger and vitriol is unhealthy over someone simply disagreeing with you.
2 Likes
Meanwhile cant stfu himself.
4 Likes
Yes, I am. The difference of course is I recognize patterns and particularly where someone is trying to win an argument on technicalities, rather than gameplay improvement and corrections.
Fix volumetric, and turret ring needs fixes.
And the usual opps won’t have to hear me talk back on their stonewalling.
5 Likes
You’re toxic, sarcastic, stonewalling punks
Wow. I couldn’t imagine a more fun person to discuss with when this is the type of person who declares they are the ones trying to make the game better. You could have just disagreed, ignored the post or ultimately discontinue engagement. But you have to resort to this sort of behavior? Is this truly the penultimate of what US mains can conjure up when faced with adversity or at it’s very basic level, disagreement?
I don’t even have to dig through this thread to see that you’re at the very least one of the more lower echelon individuals to engage with, you’re impractical, rude and most of all extremely intolerant of an alternate perspective.
You later say “I can recognize patterns and particularly where someone is trying to win an argument on technicalities, rather than gameplay improvement and corrections.” while throwing out every trick in the book including using technicalities. You’re essentially shutting down the argument while claiming others to be the stonewaller that in reality is you. If you cannot adequately back up your own statements with formulated responses and articulated paragraphs perhaps another form of creativity would suit you best.
5 Likes
Throwing up walls of logic and arguing a point until it is moot is not a ‘fun discussion’, it is rendering someone’s observations as being illogical while denying evidence by lived experience that a fact is a fact. So yes I will shut down that form of argument purely based on the fact that it is, at its core, disingenuous and stonewalling.
So perhaps instead of trying to find creativity in arguments, I suggest you and others like you not do so purely for the sake of ‘civil disagreement’. Then perhaps you will find yourselves in better spirits and in better company.
Otherwise, you’re simply here to argue a point until your opponent throws up their hands and walks away and you can smirk about it afterwards.
I can find tons of people that has similiar stats while playing other nations.
One indiviual Service record doesnt mean anything, unless you intend to use it for your cherry pick claim of course.
1 Like
Dying to a gepard you could kill in oneshot is genuinely a skill issue
1 Like
I didn’t die to it in one shot, I said I lost my gunner at 550 meters to an APDS spam while coming out of defilade. Which should not have happened.
Such a shame that he couldn’t figure out the pattern of gameplay thats causing him to die consistently and resorts to whining just like most of these US mains
3 Likes
If it only was these two…
2 Likes
Just like other nations players.
Every nation has players like them, using them to justify your claim is pointless tbh.
1 Like
walls of logic
I really want you to think about the words you just presented me with. Do you mean a paragraph that accurate rebukes your statement? Because that’s what I think of when I hear “walls of logic”
I refuse to believe that you are stonewalling purely because you’re presented with something disingenuous, especially when you’re responding in a manner such as:
My God you really will come up with any goddamn excuse won’t you?
Btch there aren’t any other inclines
“You absolutely deserved”, my ass. F*ck off!
It honestly seems like you’re just grasping at straws when in reality you have no fundamental responses to the core arguments at play, Ultimately you’re just using those same technicalities that you accuse others of using.
Then later on my favorite part is you try to generalize a side of the discussion not realizing that there’s numerous factors at play and that this is not a team based discussion but instead a varying selection of individuals. “and users like you” as if to corral a select portion of people and imply they’re on the same team.
To say that people are doing something purely for the sake of ‘civil disagreement’ is ineffable at best, I would heavily recommend that you temper your emotions and restore some sort of semblance of calm before you continue to post.
There are great points put up by your opposition such as:
The M1 series does not need better ammo as it would not solve any issues.
The M1 series does not need a change in BR as it would not solve any issues
The M1 series does not need artificial buffs as it would not solve any issues
In reality what the vehicle needs is for it’s users to temper their expectations and rely more so on proper tactics and usage of the vehicle, not just popping out at random intervals and “I lost my gunner at 550 meters to an APDS spam while coming out of defilade. Which should not have happened.” which honestly begs the question. Why shouldn’t this have happened? There’s enough variables in the game for this to be a completely valid play. You shouldn’t blame the game for user error.
5 Likes
For starters… you may want to re-think that logic… always best to make sure it is always officially declassified… and one requirement when posting sources on our web pages is that title of document and official declassification is noted
As for the Thread… at this point I dont think it can be salvaged… too far gone and some just dont like to have nice things…
7 Likes