fr
Italy 3rd best? It gets 1 2a7 then has to use the ariete.
also SPAA is just… yeah
Yeah, I like the OTO but it just don’t cut it in the current space lobbers meta.
Man barely has 10k matches and he’s stat shaming…
5 Likes
again not about italy
i was commenting on his lack of top tier experience and the claim he made was just stupid.
When abrams turret neck is too weak, the answer is “skill issue”, when the 2S6 stats are bad, its “Add an AA that blows everyone else’s out of the water”
Nobody is stat shaming. Maybe you should idk… look at the screenshot? Seems like you identified a stat card and just jumped to conclusions. The guy doesn’t have any tanks PERIOD. I think that says a lot.
That’s understandable, but I’ll still point out the funny hee-hee about it.
Relatively though, I’m sidin with you.
1 Like
Yes, and I’d consider that stat-shaming. He was shaming somebody else on the basis of their lack of knowledge in a field that they’re all too eager to debate in.
3 Likes
You have absolutely the dumbest logic I’ve ever heard. This is a person making wild claims they could not possibly know about, being that they havent experienced that part of the game. Look at my stat card. Would a point I make about naval ships not being good enough be a valid point? Hell no. Why would it be a good thing for someone to talk out of their ass knowing they havent even experienced the part of the game they’re complaining about. It’s like a reserve player complaining about the M1A2 APFSDS being too strong.
I feel it’s quite sound. What’s “dumb” about it?
Yes, hence why he was shamed for his statistics. I feel this isn’t a very hard concept to grasp, especially as you’re restating what I said.
Hence why your stats may be pulled up in a hypothetical debate about naval, and you’d be shamed for your lack of experience in the topic.
Is this starting to make any sense to you, or do I need to be more clear?
Who said it’s a good thing?
3 Likes
Wait till you see the 65 tons of air in the Merkava 4 (which should also be 80 tons and not 65 lol)
1 Like
Because thats 100% valid and someone who hasn’t even seen what they are talking about… shouldn’t be talking about it?
Are you okay?
You better watch what you ask for. You know Gaijin will add the weight, but not the armor, lmao
It was their own words when they said they wouldn’t buff the armor because it isn’t heavy enough to receive it.
1 Like
I believe it, but gaijin is such a bad company I don’t see them implementing anything correctly.
Yes. I have not experienced that part of the game. This is a fact. But I can look at X-ray mode and see inconsistency with publicly available documents regarding armor. Thus I can confidently say they are missing that in game. What I said was also about general strategy, unfortunately that’s not relevant in war thunder due to how the game is set up. But it was relevant to the conversation. Stat shaming is ok IF someone was for example saying the MiG-29 needed a buff because it was underperforming against other fighters but they had never played a MiG-29. This was not that.
X-ray mode is extremely misleading tbh, and so is protection analysis