Hence why I said I am all for the Abrams having its correct armor. I am sorry if I de-railed your post from what you wanted it to be. I am glad you found the docs on it and can hopefully work towards Gaijin implementing correct armor values.
Pictures are cool, of course, but in order for developers to make changes to the booking, more information is needed. For example: where are these images from, make comparisons of how much more booking there is (where there is more booking), booking material… In general, more information is needed
1 Like
even then, its insane how hard it is to get them to see this. abrams players have been complain for the longest time and always the just throw in skill issue all though its still painful to play when every body else is more unique or just better in some way.
i gave the source
here is where you can find it, follow the image i sent to find the pdf.
You’re saying that as the Ariete MBT performs the same way as the Leopard 2As with same ammunition.
not about nato here…
Abrams in the game it seem like some export monkey model rather than US standard especially SepV2
2 Likes
fr
Italy 3rd best? It gets 1 2a7 then has to use the ariete.
also SPAA is just… yeah
Yeah, I like the OTO but it just don’t cut it in the current space lobbers meta.
Man barely has 10k matches and he’s stat shaming…
5 Likes
again not about italy
i was commenting on his lack of top tier experience and the claim he made was just stupid.
When abrams turret neck is too weak, the answer is “skill issue”, when the 2S6 stats are bad, its “Add an AA that blows everyone else’s out of the water”
Nobody is stat shaming. Maybe you should idk… look at the screenshot? Seems like you identified a stat card and just jumped to conclusions. The guy doesn’t have any tanks PERIOD. I think that says a lot.
That’s understandable, but I’ll still point out the funny hee-hee about it.
Relatively though, I’m sidin with you.
1 Like
Yes, and I’d consider that stat-shaming. He was shaming somebody else on the basis of their lack of knowledge in a field that they’re all too eager to debate in.
3 Likes
You have absolutely the dumbest logic I’ve ever heard. This is a person making wild claims they could not possibly know about, being that they havent experienced that part of the game. Look at my stat card. Would a point I make about naval ships not being good enough be a valid point? Hell no. Why would it be a good thing for someone to talk out of their ass knowing they havent even experienced the part of the game they’re complaining about. It’s like a reserve player complaining about the M1A2 APFSDS being too strong.