Strange how accurate they are for other nations. Just look at the Panthers. They exactly care on what version or sub-versions had engine limiters or reduced turret traverse. Now Panther pre production prototype and early D model are the best ones (not limited at all). While more advanced late Panthers had real life limiters to enhance service time of engine and transmission parts. Despite maintenance is not implemented ingame, Gajin gladly took over all speed limitations. So those late Panthers at higher BRs are strangely the worst ones.
Same should happen with these T-tanks. I know these vids. The ingame T-tanks are designed after factory brochures or single tanks presented on defense tech fairs and trials. Instead they should model them after service tanks. There are, for obvious reasons, alot vids from intact russian tanks, where you can see their real performance.
I watched this replay earlier today and you absolutely deserved what happens given you decided to overexpose yourself because you picked your spawn camping spot to be on slightly too great of an incline.
Pick your spawn camping locations better next time maybe with a slightly shallower incline and you won’t need to needlessly expose more of your tank than necessary to get the depression to kill the guy in spawn.
You’re right clearly it isn’t your fault that you picked a poor section of terrain to spawncamp on, when you could’ve moved to a different area where you could spawncamp and not have to overexpose yourself.
It’s everybody elses fault aside from yours, you’re so hard done by.
Pick your spawn camping location better next time.
Yes you were top of the team because you immediately rushed over to somewhere you could shoot into their spawn. I never said anything about your position on the team.
I guess the rest of the team should have simply not bothered trying to gain points and done the same, shame they didn’t.
My heart bleeds for you. Anyways, pick your spawn camping location better next time. I’ll even load up the game and find you some alternatives that look into that spawn where the terrain is better for you.
Point being, 550 meters, lost gunner to a APDS round from a Gepard. The Abrams model is not right, needs correction, and the map designs suck sweaty balls and need fixing.
The point being you could have entirely avoided having lost your gunner if you positioned better for your spawn camping. Map design is another bag entirely.
Otherwise, keep your mouth shut.
I must’ve forgotten when they made you a moderator and gave you the authority to decide who can or can’t post. Are you going to threaten to falsely flag next, again? Like you did earlier?
No I’m just going to ignore your sarcastic unproductive ass.
And there we go with the usual toxicity expected from your lot at this point.
You will be glad to know on loading into that map on the M1A1 I have already found that if you had been positioned slightly to the right of where you were, you would have had sufficient gun depression to be able to fire at that gepard with only your barrel line and above being visible.
I hope this information is useful and you will apply it next time you try to spawn camp on this map. I’m sure if you search around that area you will be able to find other spots too and this will improve your gameplay and skill. You’re welcome.
Typing actually. This is a forum. People type things on them. But do go on with your toxic namecalling meanwhile I’m trying to provide you with helpful information so that you may further improve your skill and gameplay.
There is always room for improvement in your spawn camping.
Internet tough guy and smartass. Proven wrong, still can’t swallow it. I can understand. Meanwhile we’ll wait for Gaijin to correct the Abrams turret ring.
The irony in this statement given that you were just trying to threaten me to be quiet with some vague threat that you have no grounds to do so with, and your threats to others earlier in this thread with similar threats of false flagging. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Still wanting the final word? Here, word. You may finish your feeble fight of “I wanna be proven right so let me continue to engage in nasty bitchy behavior until my opp rages”.
I’ve been nothing but civil, you’re the one swearing, being toxic and making threats at people constantly. You’re projecting way too much and you’re also derailing the thread once again because all you’re doing is throwing out insults because you can’t handle that you made a mistake.
Hopefully you calm down because this amount of anger and vitriol is unhealthy over someone simply disagreeing with you.
Yes, I am. The difference of course is I recognize patterns and particularly where someone is trying to win an argument on technicalities, rather than gameplay improvement and corrections.
Wow. I couldn’t imagine a more fun person to discuss with when this is the type of person who declares they are the ones trying to make the game better. You could have just disagreed, ignored the post or ultimately discontinue engagement. But you have to resort to this sort of behavior? Is this truly the penultimate of what US mains can conjure up when faced with adversity or at it’s very basic level, disagreement?
I don’t even have to dig through this thread to see that you’re at the very least one of the more lower echelon individuals to engage with, you’re impractical, rude and most of all extremely intolerant of an alternate perspective.
You later say “I can recognize patterns and particularly where someone is trying to win an argument on technicalities, rather than gameplay improvement and corrections.” while throwing out every trick in the book including using technicalities. You’re essentially shutting down the argument while claiming others to be the stonewaller that in reality is you. If you cannot adequately back up your own statements with formulated responses and articulated paragraphs perhaps another form of creativity would suit you best.
Throwing up walls of logic and arguing a point until it is moot is not a ‘fun discussion’, it is rendering someone’s observations as being illogical while denying evidence by lived experience that a fact is a fact. So yes I will shut down that form of argument purely based on the fact that it is, at its core, disingenuous and stonewalling.
So perhaps instead of trying to find creativity in arguments, I suggest you and others like you not do so purely for the sake of ‘civil disagreement’. Then perhaps you will find yourselves in better spirits and in better company.
Otherwise, you’re simply here to argue a point until your opponent throws up their hands and walks away and you can smirk about it afterwards.
