I’m suprised a link to that thread hasn’t appeared in the RR&D thread yet.
2 Likes
it should penetrate Relikt by who’s words? in that regard T-90M should have -30 km/h reverse and 5 sec reload
So your talking about a round that was designed to defeat modern ERA and made up stats for the t90m that you made up?
1 Like
modern era is k-5. right
True, got you!
Although that may attract the attention of more Anti-Abrams/America, but… worth a shot, hahah
4 Likes
Relict is based on the working principle behind Malakhit (Object 187), It’s not like it was unknown in the late '90-early '00 period when -A3 was developed.
1 Like
so that automatically means a3 can pierce it. sure. meanwhile in game you literally need ke-w or m900 to kill any megamodern russian t-90 lmfao
People fail to realise that you could have probably have bought a bit of Kaktus ERA from some Russian General if you had the money. Back in the 90s everything Russia had was for sale, they were so rife with corruption and people took advantage like Lockheed who bought the test data for the Yak-141
You do get that armor is implemented as documented(for the most part), penetrative characteristics of APFSDS gets run through formula.
I shouldn’t have to point out that in in game stats are not in alignment with known documentation
1 Like
Well one benefit is that there are usually a bunch of British mains in that thread. And given that they are also getting an M1A2C, it’s now their problem too.
Maybe C&P isn’t so bad; if everyone suffers?
1 Like
all that yap is only to lolpen things that you almost lolpen now. interesting af
True! Until now, British mains kept trying to undermine any efforts to improve the Abrams because they felt like it was a threat to them… now that they also have Abrams tanks, suddenly improving them has become their fight too lol
6 Likes
And relikt?
How many people have interacted with it now?
Whoa we never had an issue with the M1 we have always hated Russia and sometimes Germany because the trauma caused by the Leopard 2A5 although the XM-1 at it’s peak also slapped…
350 votes so far!
At this rate, it may become as much of a relevant topic as stock APFSDS was back in the day.
And even if it doesn’t, I believe that the fact that a topic about a SINGLE vehicle is drawing attention at a rate remotely similar to that of an issue that affected all of Top Tier is really… telling about how many people are concerned about this.
LET’S GO!
8 Likes
Yeah let’s go, hopefully we can apply as much pressure gaijin as much as we did back with the sepv2 lol
1 Like
Keep up the good work lads!
4 Likes
I don’t quiet understand this. How is the lower front plate has moved forward? I did a comparison on dev server with M1A2 and there doesn’t seem any change except the turret cheeks.
EDIT: Oh nvm. Didn’t realize it was an real life picture of the SEP V3
2 Likes