Should we get the eu involved and force gaijin to stop their kremlin pandering lmaooo
1 Like
I don’t want to. We’ll see what happens when it’s released.
you can go write a complaint to Gaaga or something right now. if Gaijin gets pushed out of EU, they can finally start making REAL russian bias and we’ll see how game changes
To avoid getting my comment killed you’re going to have to read a little in between the lines.
- Money.
- People with power. A lot of them agreed because of 1.
- Documented and reported, just don’t use google and do some digging.
Natsec is not a real thing anymore as a result. Therefore, we are here as one of many small consequences getting our junk denied as a form of psywar.
You hit some young guys dopamine hit source hard enough and he will eventually share stuff he shouldnt. This sort of pressure applied over long periods is cheaper, and costs a heck of a lot less with a higher level of success rate because the subject has no idea it’s an intentional environment.
1 Like
You wont. Because this is small potatoes and because it applies social pressure and is one of millions of tiny psywar pressure points to terraform a thought processes of a people group into one that welcomes a potential future conflict.
Think macro, not micro.
And they would immediately kill their game lol
1 Like
Yeah it was more of a joke lol
Fair point.
sources that guys usually post are useless brochures and wannabe-results with stupid guesses of some people they consider know something. literally nothing special. scariest sikret document gaijin might work with is Su-27 manual just because techmods were too blind to accept it and fix flight model
nope, in fact nothing changes in balancing or anything. will be same as with Russian WoT client.
Do you think gaijin is based in Russia or smthn? It’s Hungarian lol. And if they game is so unbalanced, no one is going to play it lol?
True, but like I said, docs have been leaked that were sensitive.
And ehile they may not get the end point docs of current tech, they have models to take older data and predict probable avenues of dev/research/current capabilities.
That said, lets move on before I get this thread locked or our stuff deleted.
Probably should stick to talking about the Abrams lol
2 Likes
Company doesnt have to be based in a nation to work for it man. What other nation do you see getting secret gear implemented “properly” or fairly?
Or blatantly OP lol, talking modern era. Not saying no other OP vehicles have been released by being under br’d. Think in terms of patterns.
Yep.
sofa politicians and religious cultists are not exception for most, if not all countries. they always pay for what happens in game for long time already.
1 Like
Did you see this? There haven’t been any bug reports calling for a Relikt ERA buff. They just went ahead and increased the armor effectiveness of every tank equipped with Relikt ERA by hundreds of percent. I’m honestly speechless.
4 Likes
About 4 months ago some dude did a data mine, with pictures showing invisible armor panels and the numberical protection values for things like trunions in russian mbts.
They are waaaaay over buffed but russians still cry. Gues 70% match up pf bmpt to spawn games isnt enough of a win rate for them.
Also, they shadow updated the breaches on T series tanks. So that they’re super small and armored.
So, you were given the M829A3, which should penetrate the Relic and the K-5. But it doesn’t, because, according to the developer, “what’s your evidence?” Okay, so the K-5 can be penetrated at certain angles. But the Relic can’t, even though the Relic is the same K-5, just with more explosives.
3 Likes
T series are still weak in turrets and driver ports. that “buff” will only play role against rounds of lower tier at very good angle. in general, areas where you shouldn’t shoot, do not change. giant holes in upper part of tank also do not go