I’d like to ask how a value or estimation would even be attainable with the classified data of the Abrams.
The only other value to go with is what @Necrons31467 had, but it was still rejected from a moderator so, I don’t believe anything can really satisfy gaijin.
Ya they are doing it on purpose at this point so there is really no satisfying them its like talking to a wall.
I’ll see if I can get necrons involved in a new post, with the addition of existing sources we have
Wish you the best of luck I’ll add anything I could but it seems like they have their minds already made up.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum, keep strong. Thank you for your hard work
dont know if this has been posted here at all
but clearly states improved ballistic protection
which is way too vague
yeah its vague, but does mean the armor package is improved against things other than IEDs which is something some BRMs have tried to imply
hey guys i merged it all into a bigger chunk of evidence , i hope this helps, it practically adds nothing new, but maybe they change their minds a bit if they see it all in one(yes i used some AI, but only to make the pdf itself)
M1A2C_evidencemerged.zip (3.9 MB)
Sorry, what did they use with the 2A7V?
Cus it’s worse than the KVT, and has worse turret armor than the 2A5 in-game…
What they did to the 2A7V, was nerf its armor on the dev, from Strv 122/TVM like level on the hull, to a Leopard 2 KVT level.
made a 3rd bug report to argue about mod’s response being wrong, here goes nothing
M1A2C missing Next Evolution Armor (NEA) for turret & hull (pt3) // Gaijin.net // Issues
getting snarky with the bug report managers wont achieve anything, they have the power here
And they removed it lol
As he said they have the power there.
We’re going to need to find something that specificly states frontal hull armor improvement if we going to have any chance.
why wouldnt they you were being very rude
This is starting to get ridiculous, got back from a 10 hour shift and can’t believe that most recent one was denied. We have Yak-141s with IRST and R-73. We have T-80Us with thermals even though only one production variant had it. We have F-16AJs, which are literally 100% fictional. We have the Sovetsky Soyuz, which was 20% completed (less than the Maus, which they fucking removed from the game), but yet we can’t have an Abrams with DU hull armor, even after Gaijin has admitted that at least five models have been equipped with it, and being a modular, interchangable section of chobham, is hypothetically very easy to add on to other models (logic of T-80U having thermals for example.)
I think it’s obvious that Gaijin simply just doesn’t want to add this feature whether it is even true or not.
Funny, I’m starting to remember how long ago the last time Gaijin actually listened to the community, which shall not be said on the forum.
Tbf, he does have a reason
enough for gaijin always has been
well not 100%, like 80%
boats have different rules
not why the maus was “removed”
we have a maus with DU armour, just not DU hull armour
gaijin just wont accept any source that doesnt have specific numbers, which doesnt really exist
