Yes
Like I said, this confirms my theory of selective bias.
7 Likes
I’m speaking to the OP to see how we’d proceed. See if we can reach out to Stona or someone else. It doesn’t seem this moderator read all the sources.
4 Likes
I’ve already done that, btw
3 Likes
I just don’t get how the turret doesn’t need values but the hull does.
4 Likes
At this point, the only thing we can do is wait for the youtubers who have a bit of traction to make a video about this horse raddish. Maybe then and ONLY then would they listen.
I asked him that and never got a reply, so idk.
Because gaijin likes their copy paste m1 hull model theyve used for every m1
1 Like
Yeah cause he doesn’t answer the tough questions. I had him get pretty defensive last update or 2 updates ago about an issue.
Where tf is bug reporting manager 2 or 3… I’ve seen them couple of times. what… is he the only one allowed to check reports about the US vehicles? lmao
1 just goes to the first to respond if another chimes in they become 2
I guess the rest is not as russian biased as him
them becoming anonymous was such a bad change, because it keeps them from being reported for not doing their job
Basically saying “no because we said so” wouldnt look good from a PR standpoint so its better to say nothing
It seems the moderator is actively updating his response after closing the report
I mean that has been the round the bend answer a few times. I.E. “it’s the policy at the time and things can change” or “it’s not really x because y”
Welp, idk what else we can do; they are really just asking for classified info at this point. At least they fixed the turret ring after 2 and a half years lol.
1 Like
its just the same problem as the J15T radar, gaijin wont do anything apart from the minimum possible assumption when they cant get enough info
1 Like
they do that all the time though
with stuff like the “We believe…” (which tends to be wrong)