Bro, look
DU plates under pic, only one i could find
Its the DARPA armor that was tested in the early 90s for potential m1a2 hull armor upgrade.
1 Like
New source found! @SPANISH_AVENGER
08-02-army (1).zip (1.3 MB)
Page 31
Page 95
Both extremely clear mentions of DU inserts
Picture of DU inserts in abrams hull + source
https://btvt.narod.ru/4/burlington.htm
Thanks to @Hike_DK for confirmation and adding to bug report
A pleasure to help you all kind sirs!
10 Likes
please link the bug report so i can add same issue pls, ty for this lmao.
Something wrong with the portal
but
Have we refenced the GAO report? for SE Block II armor improvements?
NSIAD-90-57 Abrams Tank: Block II Modifications Not Ready to Enter Production
The Block II tank modification package is designed to meet the future Soviet tank threat of the mid-1990s. Definition of this threat is based on the expected fielding of the Soviet tank known as the “FST2.”
As per NATO sources FTS 2 was expected to beat 700mm RHA @Flame2512 Did you have the cover page for this document?
Can also see a reference to ?M1A1 Block 2? at 650mm, on the upper scale.
5 Likes
True that, having a 500mm+ hull would be cool.
2 Likes
Um guys i cant add anything else to the main bug report its over the main character limit
Drop it into the comments, and compress the files attached into a zip to get more than 10.
Okay, so its’ not only me? Since we can’t add anything?
i cant sign in for some reason, i would add i have same issue, but ur doing gods work lmao. i doubt they can put “not enough information” with everything you added
and if they do, idek what we can possibly do lmao
i am genuinely quitting i finished that thing at 3 am and have not slept since i am running on 3 hours of sleep
This is an issue I ran into too.
Are you able to add the SE Block 2 Armor improvements or do we need someone to comment it in?
damn, good luck lol
I don’t have a cover page for the gun / armor performance chart, or attribution for the Survivability Enhancements slide.
but like thats all classified, so how can the expect us to add it? or am i wrong?
I’m sorry, my brain isn’t braining. Does this mean you don’t have a document/site to reference for gaijin as primary/secondary source?
Oh…
Basically yes.
1 Like