No number could have been used because it’s classified in its entirety, we only know of a turret AND HULL improvement to armour
Preach 🙏
1 Like
So if it’s actually made up but we have documentation showing both are changed, then their argument holds no weight and a mod could prove or disprove what they used
Yeah but gaijin has the mentality that they have nothing to prove to anyone and for any form of change you need classified documents to even make them consider change.
11 Likes
We are now at like 6 reports denied because of random stuff. Most recent one i read was talking about the program where m1a1s were updated straight to sepv3s (if someone could find proof of one of the vehicles in service from this program maybe add onto that bug report?) blatantly stating “the turret and hull armor was increased” for the m1a1 → sepv3 program. Bug report denied because “its a program not a service manual” or something along those lines…??? I swear someone high up at gaijin told the bug reporting managers “theyre gonna be mad that theres no DU in the hull, just deny all the bug reports and say nothing else and theyll forget eventually” or something
1 Like
should we just try to get a lot of people to report the current bug reporting manager? we even have a reason why to so this isn’t anything bad
At this point we are better off spamming bug report daily.
i reported them for misinformation
Crispy100001 coming clutch with this one [DEV] M1A2C hull armor incorrect // Gaijin.net // Issues if this gets closed, its probably over and we know for sure they made the decision to keep sepv3 gimped on purpose. The amount of info in this report proving the armor upgrade in the hull is crazy.
9 Likes
6 Likes
You never know, he might be stuck back in time during the Cuban missile crisis
If they have the balls to do that, perhaps we should resort to alternate communication methods which they’ve actually listened to in the past.
6 Likes
A report bigger then jesus itself, best of hopes for this report, it’s fr our last resort
1 Like
Ya its probably going to get closed. I dm Smi about this bug report, and according to him, they are looking for armor values which it doesn’t have because the armor is classified. So basically we are cooked because they can’t make an estimation as they did with the turret.
1 Like
What I wonder is- how come they don’t even use the 35% figure?
Much like they did with the 2A7s?
Even the 35% figure is probably lowballed and outdated, BUT at least it would not be 1979-level of outdated… a better estimation whan the current nonsensical mess.
2 Likes
I even included that in the bug report comments hopefully they read it.
1 Like
I’m ready in case the known individual closes that report.
1 Like
I love how it became a worldwide recognizing feature lmao
begging for classified documents, these report managers gotta be FSB agents lmao
2 Likes