M1A2C controversy

Dev Server "Heavy Cavalry" General Discussion - Dev Server
,
1

Just wanted to show this regarding the armor on the M1A2C as well as the thermals.

image
image1510×752 140 KB

image
image1078×821 165 KB

image
image1102×787 159 KB

image
image1208×752 181 KB
- this is in regards to the LFP armor

I show these screen shots because many things in game aren’t in service, such as the trash bags of era seen on the T80BVM, or the more well know fake KH38MT. Yet when something real is posted about the M1A2C we need an exact source from GD signed off from all of congress and a interview with all of the US army leadership showing the armor on all the Abrams generations. To be 100% clear i don’t think this is “Russian Bias” but just a double standard, this happens with other nations besides Russia. On the flip side i do think it needs to be discussed if a “project” or modification was made it should be in game. Just because its not factory made that way, doesn’t make it “not real” or “just a field modification”.

1 Like
2

Maybe instead of making a forum on the abrams situation specifically there should be a forum talking about the double standard specifically with the m1 more as a recent example, to share our opinions on the bug reporting system

2 Likes
3

I’m tempted to do that, but in the end it’s always going to be what-about-ism. Never the issue at hand.

Warthunder forums aren’t really productive when it’s a a nation based issue.

1 Like
4

Hello

Please use existing open topics on a subject rather than starting another new additional one: The standards to revise M1A2 SEPv3's armor NEED to be revised and calibrated

1 Like