M1A2C Abrams: Heavy Cavalry!

Very stupid

The SEP V3 should have more armor and visibly more armor plates on the front hull. Visually, it’s a lazy copy of the SEP V2 and is completely disconnected from what the real SEP V3 looks like. It’s incredible how Gaijin refuses to implement what actually exists, yet is a master at inventing things that don’t."

5 Likes

Australian Abrams finally being with the other Australian vehicles is nice.

Really hoping we give the Canadians (and any other countries in other trees) the same treatment. No player should be forced to grind multiple trees just to play their countries vehicles.

Also, considering the amount of copy-paste this update why couldn’t Britain finally get the Locust I, Boarhound I, and T14? The British were the only ones to actually use the Locust (M22) in combat. All of the production Boarhounds (T18E2) were sent to Britain. Then the T14 was built at British request, to British specifications, with British money, and then the second prototype was sent to Britain for evaluation.

8 Likes

We could get the uniquely modified M22 Littlejohn. Kinda surprised it’s still missing.

Every new Abrams seems same but with less mobility due to increased weight , if they can’t make Armour strong and not give APS to sepv3 then what’s the point of adding it lol

4 Likes

No benefit over the v2 and v2 trophy btw

1 Like

I mean, that could be a unique modification.

Exactly. Britain should get MEXAS at the very least.

The only 37/40 mm vehicle that I haven’t found evidence of being equipped with LJ is the Churchill mk.1

And my tree end research bonus will be gone , plus no compensation of folder sepv2, no multiple smoke grenade system no laser warning receiver, everything “new” added to USA is objectively bad and bring no improvement only makes game more grindy

2 Likes

Polish tech tree the only option 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

3 Likes

Bloco de Citação Every new Abrams seems same but with less mobility due to increased weight , if they can’t make Armour strong and not give APS to sepv3 then what’s the point of adding it lol

1,000,000 T-72s in-game. Another 500,000 T-80s. Every update somehow finds room for yet another Russian T-80 or T-72 variant, but adding the SEP V3 is suddenly a problem because it’s “too similar” to other tanks. Give me a break.

There’s nothing identical in this picture. In fact, all we’re asking for is this:

lnbbz75l6cnc1

I log into the game and all I see is an “M1A2C” with a SEP V2 skin and M829A3 ammunition. Is it really that hard to do this shit properly?

4 Likes

I am not saying it’s same, it’s Gaijin who think it’s same and make it that way, you didn’t get what i wrote

1 Like

1 Like

Jesus Christ, first they fucked up the F-14D, and now they are fucking up the newest + latest variant of the Abrams? I swear, I think Gaijin has monkeys operating their company.

Btw, they need to change the name to M1A2 SepV3, since that is the correct name, not M1A2C.

5 Likes

Bebrams eating good.

you do realise that we have had a mixed matchmaker for years at this point ?

1 Like

Please drop the off-topic.

1 Like

France and russia, france being the biggest in western europe and russia one of the biggest in the world.
I didn’t mean military though. I meant in general xD

As you say.

Anyways I’m happy we got the Australian Abrams I’ve always wanted to see a copy of the AIM’s now, that this blog confirms Australia’s place within the game I hope to create more pure sub line ups like this in the future.

3 Likes