Why are you using such a low angle?
I don’t want my nation in British tree either, it’s absurd decision, i wish indian vehicle doesn’t get added in research tree in future , squadron vehicle or event vehicle is good option, i can’t nor i want to grind whole British tree just to play a tank i want
This makes more sense
Absurd
Whole tech tree concept in it’s current form is flawed, it’s just way how gaijin makes it’s profit i guess
1 Like
“Closest militarily.” Australia is the 5th largest importer of U.S. military equipment.
Just say you want more U.S. stuff in the British tree
Also if the turret ring is fixed. It’s funny they only START fixing it once they start importing the tank to other tech trees.
3 Likes
Australian vehicles have been in the British tree since before subtrees even existed as a concept. There were domestic Australian vehicles as premiums in the British tree back when Gaijin refused to implement the RAF Mustang as anything other than a premium despite it literally being made for the RAF, because the import policies were that stringent.
on thin enough targets with the impact point delayed mode you could end up using it as a APHE shell, doubt it be able to do it in game seeing how they refuse to give it its improved hull protection
Can SEPs get M829A2 as tier1 modification or stock shell like merkava4s and Ariete?
I mean until they make the SEPv3 a worthwhile addition there is still some stuff to complsin about, especially what is currently going on with the bug reports.
I would go as far as to say that when the M1A2C weight gets corrected it’ll be the worst 12.7 Abrams if it’s armor stays like this.
1 Like
Gaijins choices are -
Create a Commonwealth tree which doesnt fix the problem for you - as US, German, Swedish and others would all be in the same tree.
Add them to the countries that manufactured them -
Ok Germany get another Leopard 2 or a Boxer
US get more M1 and F/A-18s
Or split them like they have done which is no use for
People who want to build lineups
1 Like
How would Germany/sweden/USA be in the same tree?
I’d buy the novel about this and get the author signed on the first page.
1 Like
I’d go to the signing and get a selfie
1 Like
Japan with Leopard 2RI, Oplot-T, Type 10, TKX, Gripen C, Mig 29N, Su 30MKM, F/A-18D late, F-16A OCU, F-2A, F-15J(M), Type 03, Rafael F4, Type 90, Type 90B, Object 478DU8, AH-64E, VT-4 and PT-91M
One issue I have is what happens to indigenous vehicles or vehicles that were the only gap to fill if we solely go off this.
Years ago, in the old forum, comm mocked teaboos who constantly demanded commonwealth top tier additions for UK TT.
So someone posted something like this. An absurd everything tech tree, at least for this WT era. With all major tech included. Everyone laughed and agreed that War Thunder never should be like this. Its astonishing how time changed. UK TT is about to look exactly like this and more.
Its devastating for immersion, balancing and uniqueness of TTs. You may also include jets + choppers.
I believe a Canada-Australia-New Zealand tree would’ve prevented most of the bickering. At the very least, im glad one nation no longer is split.
Now I wonder what Gajin does with Canada, Spain and Poland.
1 Like
Swedish SAAB - JAS 39 RSA
Canada - Leo 2s/LAV
USA - M1 and aircraft
Eurocopters as well. They could access almost all ingame tech with this Empire trick.
1 Like
This is talking about a theoretical standalone Canada-Australia-New tree. It would actually free up more space for UK vehicles while Giving Canada a permanent home.
America currently isn’t part of the commonwealth and as much of a teaboo as I am, I’m fine with America not being part of a commonwealth-tree for Britain
Besides, we’re already getting Abrams via Australia. We can get more via nations like Egypt if we want too
UK absolutely doesn’t need Egypt