Eurocopters as well. They could access almost all ingame tech with this Empire trick.
1 Like
This is talking about a theoretical standalone Canada-Australia-New tree. It would actually free up more space for UK vehicles while Giving Canada a permanent home.
2 Likes
America currently isn’t part of the commonwealth and as much of a teaboo as I am, I’m fine with America not being part of a commonwealth-tree for Britain
Besides, we’re already getting Abrams via Australia. We can get more via nations like Egypt if we want too
UK absolutely doesn’t need Egypt
Not my point.
The point is that if you’re adding almost all commonwealth / former colonies, Britain is the best option as to where they go
1 Like
It really is shameful. Worse state possible rn imo.
2 Likes
Australia use Eurocopters or did and they use Ah-64E which Britain has.
Of course it shouldn’t be it was just to wind up some detractors here. let us please remember had Gaijin not taken a dump on the CR2 to appease a certain player base. We would not need or want an M1.
Most British mains just want British things to work like they should. Another fine example is the Churchill, just buff rework solid shot…nah heres APHE…
2 Likes
Exactly. I just want my shit treated fairly and represented. Like every bodies else’s fav/home country.
1 Like
You are going a little bit overboard here. Pakistan, Israel and UAE are not part of the Commonwealth.
If we are going on past Empires…Italy should have Spain, Germany, France, England (not Scotland), Greece, Africa, Israel, Egypt and parts of Arabia…
2 Likes
Is it safe to assume that the turret ring will be fixed in this update?
It depends.
I think Pakistan x U.K. relations are very very cold right now and a majority of Pakistans current and new equipment is from China so I’m not bothered.
Israel being its own tree is fine as they have a domestic MBT series and until Korea atleast, serves the purpose of being a quick access to jets nation
UAE. Idk. I’d like to have their stuff as schemes but we can most if not all of it through other countries. So not a necessity.
I think the one I’m pissed off about right now is Cyprus going to Israel.
1 Like
I do think you could have an Arab empire tech tree but again players would complain.
UAE, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and even Iran
Would cover so many vehicles, Leclerc, Pantsir, Typhoon, F-15, F-16, Tornado, Su-35, Ah-64, Ka-52, Rafale, T-90, M1, Leopard, Cr2 (not including the Chinese and South Korean systems)
Players need to realise that well only so many nations made hardware that can be exported.
2 Likes
Because i am aiming at a low spot in the hull
Bugreport on the sepv2 trophy and sep v3 not grtting LWS and ROSY:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RDa9nn36LVR9
Could someone be so kind to make a bug report on the sep v3 not having Trophy HV aps, i mean i know there aren’t any pics atm but there is ALOT of info online saying the sep v3 has been tested and equipped with trophy. I belive there is also info on the us army buying TROPHY HV for their sep v3’s
Would be very sad if only the sep v2 got trophy while the pinnicale of the abrams didn’t
2 Likes
Zenti’s showcase
1 Like
Sep v3 using trophy hv APS documents (not classified)
Please could someone make a bug report? Im making one on the sep v3 needing gen 3 thermals rn
Its the official us army testing thing
And could someone send me a very high resolution of the thermals on the sep v3 in the dev, and then a pic of actual gen 3 thermals on another vehicle?
1 Like
I just watched a simulation of XM964 vs T-72B (1989) K5 included. It penned, but just barely. I assume that A3 would have an easier time? Is it a newer round than XM964?.
Unfortunately, gaijin has made a purposeful decision not to give the SEPV3 the trophy system.
You may see this in older bug reports