Yup, if we’re positioned lower I’d go for the LFP. However, I have issues with going for the LFP when I’m level, it’s not reliable unless I am looking up into the LFP, so I tend to only take the driver and autoloader out.
In that case, I’m looking at a T series tank staring into my soul as he releases his 125 MM round.
Now, what I’m on the fence about is when I’m above the T seris tank, for general engagements I’d shoot into the drivers port, it’s more reliable. But on older T series tanks or less modified, like the T80UE, or T90A, I’m not sure what the difference is if I shoot into the UFP compared to drivers port
Downloaded dev and recorded the difference in analysis
A2
A3
My only guess is A3 stats not implied within test drive but only in hit analysis
Hit analysis shows clear difference between A2 and A3, A3 can pen UE at 500m while A2 doesn’t
I don’t want my nation in British tree either, it’s absurd decision, i wish indian vehicle doesn’t get added in research tree in future , squadron vehicle or event vehicle is good option, i can’t nor i want to grind whole British tree just to play a tank i want
This makes more sense
Absurd
Whole tech tree concept in it’s current form is flawed, it’s just way how gaijin makes it’s profit i guess
Australian vehicles have been in the British tree since before subtrees even existed as a concept. There were domestic Australian vehicles as premiums in the British tree back when Gaijin refused to implement the RAF Mustang as anything other than a premium despite it literally being made for the RAF, because the import policies were that stringent.
on thin enough targets with the impact point delayed mode you could end up using it as a APHE shell, doubt it be able to do it in game seeing how they refuse to give it its improved hull protection
I mean until they make the SEPv3 a worthwhile addition there is still some stuff to complsin about, especially what is currently going on with the bug reports.
I would go as far as to say that when the M1A2C weight gets corrected it’ll be the worst 12.7 Abrams if it’s armor stays like this.
Japan with Leopard 2RI, Oplot-T, Type 10, TKX, Gripen C, Mig 29N, Su 30MKM, F/A-18D late, F-16A OCU, F-2A, F-15J(M), Type 03, Rafael F4, Type 90, Type 90B, Object 478DU8, AH-64E, VT-4 and PT-91M
One issue I have is what happens to indigenous vehicles or vehicles that were the only gap to fill if we solely go off this.
Years ago, in the old forum, comm mocked teaboos who constantly demanded commonwealth top tier additions for UK TT.
So someone posted something like this. An absurd everything tech tree, at least for this WT era. With all major tech included. Everyone laughed and agreed that War Thunder never should be like this. Its astonishing how time changed. UK TT is about to look exactly like this and more.
Its devastating for immersion, balancing and uniqueness of TTs. You may also include jets + choppers.
