Yay I can do funny HE overpressure stuff with the Abrams now.
does this mean I need to research this round and it will get rid of M829A2 or will it be a separate modification?
Yay I can do funny HE overpressure stuff with the Abrams now.
does this mean I need to research this round and it will get rid of M829A2 or will it be a separate modification?
lmao russian mains complaining is something that is so funny.
middle of the ground mobility
womp womp reverse sucks deal with it
womp womp you have mid reload deal with it
depression really isnt that bad and you can work around it
plus side: literally almost unkillable from the front and sides even
busted model
I still cant believe russian mains have the audacity to complain at ALL because of their top tier situation. Before you complain, play literally any other nation in the game right now and come back to me. genuine bums bro
it doesnt get a better shell than the DM53… the shell is worse even though it should be better
having a m1a2 higher than a leopard 2a7 lol thats a thought
M829A3 is still worse than DM53 purely from it being an L/44
MAYBE if they ever added M829A4 AND properly modelled the anti-era tip AND properly modelled the armor, then fine, until then no. the SEP V3 is the same if not arguably worse than the base SEP, so its not better than the 2A7V at all
please tell me the Abrams has more hull armor and DU, or are we just convinced that the US hasn’t upgraded anything for the hull since the 80s
I admire the audacity to go after him in calling a Russia main (quite rude tbh), but a cursory check on his profile would reveal that he is quite far from a russian main, infact he’s closer to a US main than anything.
Being willing to call Russian tanks trash for the simple reason of being exactly that doesn’t make you a Russian main it just makes you able to see them for what they are.
I think that you shouldn’t take a highly anticipated vehicle and make it a premium while not fixing anything wrong with it (F-14D). Oh and do that for 2 other nations too (Puma U-14 and French F-16).
Other than that this dev blog format is fine. Too bad that it’s tarnished by copy pasted premiums and bad changes.
so overall this tanks improvements are
the exact same hull thats been on the abrams since the 70s because that makes sense?
the exact same shell that the abrams have already used, with a whopping 4 extra mm of pen assuming youre at point blank, with worse pen at range
zero armor improvement whatsoever except for the cheeks which, were literally the only part of the tank that WASNT a problem and is completely unrealistic since the DU improvements are in the HULL
a programmable fuze shell which half of the other nations have had for literally years now (which you cant even use since you refuse to give the abrams an air tracker either)
i guess a fixed turret ring which, i wont really count fixing a 3 year+ old bug counts as a buff
and all of this comes in for the low cost of 800k rp and 2.5 million silver lions.
what exactly is the point of this tank, again? Why would anyone even try grinding this over the base SEP and SEP V2, atleast the trophy can maybe survive a LMUR or two.
the most you gave it as a “buff” is nerfing the BMPT finally
i SERIOUSLY hope this isnt the final product
edit: ive noticed even the trophy abrams isnt worth getting. only having 35 degrees vertical coutner with a 400ms reaction time means LMURs are guaranteed to get through no problem, and even if you get lucky on a hill, theres only 3 per side, compare that to the arena with a 40ms reaction, 40 degrees vertical, and 12 charges, eh.
Mk4m is just a huge weakspot, no sugarcoating that
A2 coculd not pen K5… where did you get that. That is what the A3 was for
I found a brochure that said the AIM-120D can only pull 5G and only has 3 seconds of burn time. Where do I upload it? ;)
You have repeatedly confused newer and more effective with absolute immunity. Tanks are not Pokémon, and Relikt did not evolve the ability 'M829A3 does zero damage. A countermeasure reducing a weapon’s effectiveness does not mean the weapon’s defining anti-ERA features suddenly cease to function.
That’s like saying, “hey my car my car works great, no issues runs fine, but you know what what if i buy a more efficient car instead to save money” then going “WeLl WhY bUy A NeW one If ThE olD one CaN stIll DriVe?”
A3 can pen relict but starts to worsen at ranges of 1500m< which is why A4 was made. In warthunder at the ranges we fight at the round would pen but at 1500+ it would start to struggle. Which is why A4 was made.
maintain threat overmatch for years to come
gaijin already seems to have this brochure)))
I suppose. Pretty sure it was claimed m829a2 and a3 were more than enough for years to come… but perhaps those claims were incorrect.
Nice to see you again, it’s been a bit.
i mean they kind of were, look at the gap between their developments
6-8 years~ I was thinking more like 10-15~
Just make nuclear APFSDS lol
there is a 9 year gap between A2 and A3 IOC and 13 year gap between A3 and A4
blackhole made sabot infinitely dense surely it would make the perfect a5 material