Do we have anything in the way of actual, like. Ballpark numbers for the SEPV3’s hull armor? All I’ve seen so far is ‘The armor is upgraded’ and ‘they got depleted uranium in there’.
Like in the realm of ‘it can be reasonably demonstrated that it improves resistance against [x shell]’
People shouldn’t dare complain about the M1A2C when it gets a good turret ring and an anti-era APFSDS
…whilst Russia gets a debatably equal, if not worse T-90M rather than the T-90M2, UK gets a copy-paste Abrams, France gets a copy-paste Leopard, and Germany gets nothing.
Real threat is Relikt at top tier, not K5 lol , and that almost same penetration value isn’t helping either, it’s a nothing burger
A majority of what you face is K5 tanks because of UE1 spam. Though I agree K5 is not much of a threat. However what this spells is every nation wanting an anti-ERA shell as well. You can’t just give it to the US.
I go over it here but TL:DR, yes it’s a guess based on past research and goals:
This looks great! Keep it up!
brother, the uk tt players are happy. we get something good to play with other than mid chally 2’s which are hit and miss regardless
Isn’t 829A3 going to perfom better against Relikt as well?
Why woul the americans make the hull armor better… its been perfectly fine for 50yrs xDDDDDDD
Polish Abrams M1A2 skin when?
Huh interesting.
Are those tons long or short?
Also,damn you really work for the US Army
Oxy said it was the M1A2SEPV3
M1A2C is just another name for SEP V3.
At 12.7 they rarely appear, all appear on 11.7, i face more LMUR than UE1 at 12.7
No , only K5
Huh, I had the opposite experience. If I pull up my battle logs I can definitely guarantee i’m seeing more UE1s.
I’m having a go at making skins rn, this is so annoying to do
Short tons
Although the Challenger 3 is reportedly terrible, I would’ve loved to seen it in the game.
Along with Ryvok-1 T-90M2, Leopard 2A7A1, which could’ve genuinely been the first 13.0 tanks, and the Sep v3 at 12.7 as is.