Huh interesting.
Are those tons long or short?
Also,damn you really work for the US Army
Oxy said it was the M1A2SEPV3
M1A2C is just another name for SEP V3.
At 12.7 they rarely appear, all appear on 11.7, i face more LMUR than UE1 at 12.7
No , only K5
Huh, I had the opposite experience. If I pull up my battle logs I can definitely guarantee i’m seeing more UE1s.
I’m having a go at making skins rn, this is so annoying to do
Short tons
1 Like
Although the Challenger 3 is reportedly terrible, I would’ve loved to seen it in the game.
Along with Ryvok-1 T-90M2, Leopard 2A7A1, which could’ve genuinely been the first 13.0 tanks, and the Sep v3 at 12.7 as is.
3 Likes
So that’s the weight of the hull only? because it’s impossible the combat weight of an Abrams is half of its weight
How? If T80s can point and click on abrams, its only fair for abrams to point and click on them aswell
2 Likes
Well, in reality the L27A1 and the DM53 are anti-ERA, and I’m practically certain that the latest French APDS-FS would also be, of course, in the real world.
1 Like
we have it as the advanced test demonstrator. just lacking some proper era etc. although if they did, it would force them to fix everything wrong with the chally 2’s fixing their armor, darts etc
2 Likes
include sources used for the addition of the vehicle if they are available and unrestricted
I wish i had same experience
Is it really that annoying to make Vehicle schemes?
At least it is for me I guess
Podsumowanie
Spoiler
A lot more 80Us than BVM/90M.
1 Like
T-90M is just such a mediocre tank that nothing can and should be said about it.
If only they gave us the T-90M2 instead of the T-90M Arena-M.
1 Like
Good lord. Is it easier if it’s just decals?
what do you mean?