Well mb, I just assumed.
Which is consistent across the board, if it wasnt we wouldnt have both the t90m and t90m arena
2 Likes
My primary frustration lies with them adding MITL (not upset with this part) to helicopters that are already broken as fuck with infinite missile tracking capability on the LDIRCM sensor and lack of rotor flash on radar so now they’re immune to IR, radar, and saclos missiles. Off topic tho
2 Likes
LMURs also got their lofting removed so 🤷♂️
2 Likes
Wait what, they just terrain follow now or?
At the end of the day the sepv3 with trophy would be functionally exactly the same as the sepv2 trophy because gaijin refuses to believe the hull armor was increased, so this really just isnt needed
1 Like
Just saw a video today of someone locking the sky and using MITL to find a target anyway.
1 Like
I have not tested them yet. But I can ask someone to.
Did you even read his Post?
Here it is.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1u26572/yeah_this_seems_like_its_going_to_be_very_balanced/
1 Like
Definitely should get the Version with the APS. Or have it as an Modification to be unlocked.
But isn’t Russian so theres that; probably going to be split into two different Abrams. Same as Chinas VT4 and VT4A1 (not even foldered btw)
Cant wait for this to expose how bad non LMUR ir guided agms really are
How so? I don’t really bother with A2G munitions like that.
lmurs consistently one shot while JAGMs are so bad youre encouraged to fire 3+ per target because it doesnt have enough russian bias to one shot a target (misses center mass very often, and doesnt have the explosive mass nor lofting angle to compensate unlike LMURs. theres an accepted bug report for the JAGMs loft from like months ago that hasnt been implemented yet that would like double its loft angle)
2 Likes
Theoretically is possible to make bug report for giving SepV2 with APS an wielded plate for turret atleast.
1 Like
just like what happens to russian tanks too
did you?
he says this and then provides a photo of a sepv3 without an APS
1 Like
I did. That is why i am asking you if you did because your Comments make zero sense.
Like your whole first three Comments are already answered in his Post…OP says theres an v3 Abrams with no APS. He is just asking why that Version gets added and not the Abrams with the APS in the next Update.
And then you go bro theres an Abrams with no APS…
well when he says this I cant help but think that he doesnt believe a sepv3 without aps exists, because yeah the devs are right here, there are sepv3s without aps so why say it like this, sure I can understand being annoyed the sepv3 we are getting doesnt have an aps but why does he blame the devs for thinking that a sepv3 without an aps exists?
where?
You are misreading what he said.
He could have formulated it better…but it really ain’t that hard to get what he means.
regardless of what I read, his point still just doesnt exist, the developers arent wrong, there are versions of the sepv3 without aps, and this is not different to how other nations are treated in the same/similar cases, I mean the t90M existed before the t90m arena