Yeah? Between the M1A2 SEP and SEPv2 there’s a little under a tonne of difference.
It’s 1.5 tonnes?
This is pretty blatantly ignorant, seeing as every Abrams since the legacy M1 had DU implemented into its armor. This isn’t an argument about its realistic protection, you just use “b-but DU!1!!11” as an empty reason to have more armor.
The HA packages of HAP-1 and HAP-2 are based off of testing against M1A1s with EAP-2 +10% effective armor to account for domestic packages.
What?
I do? I’ve argued on their autoloaders, their patterns of armor, their gun nomenclature and capability, and their ammunition.
Beautiful whataboutism, though.
gaijoob is known for years to push russian propaganda and make the t80’s like somekind of superman, and yes it would but they don’t that’s why there’s always a graveyard full of seps everygame and usa winrate is so low but will gaijoob do something about it like they did to the russians with adding the object? naaah let them suffer.
Gaijin can argue all they want that the SEPv3 won’t have better hull armor, but we have absolute proof that it does, aside from the pictures of the weight simulators.
u didn’t reply on the leopard and strvs controversy and why they’re more powerful than the leopards?
why don’t u argue about their invisible spall liners that’s been in them for years now but naah u pull them arguments just when u hear a topic on the abrams
Because there’s nothing of substance for me to add? Swedish S-122s are effectively an enigma, and info on the composites used is so hard to gain that not even the visual model is confirmed to be correct.
Invisible spall liners? What kind of special are you?
He said the successor to the M1A2 SEPv4, and I’d assume that means the M1E3. Any newsletter I find that mentions Safran optics links them to the booker and M1E3.
