That… Is another SEPv2.
Hell, it isn’t even an undoctored SEPv2 photo, it’s flipped for christ’s sake.
4 Likes
I think that i know gaijin well enough to say that there is a 90% chance that they will make this shit. Something won’t work 'cause of the spaghetti code. They won’t add something else 'cause… it’s gaijin, and so on
they are gonna give it the same KE protection but like 100mm more CE protection and call it good
and force you to bring TUSK and mineroller so its going to be very slow
1 Like
SEP v2 with a plow 0 changes otherwise
Plow and TUSK kit cannot be removed
2000kg more weight that cannot be accounted for
(Satire ofc but I will not be surprised if this happens)
2 Likes
they should give dozer blade to tusk kit
I got a better idea! Why wont we remove the engine😀?
if the ingame tractions are better then it would be faster
1 Like
ABSOLUTELY. I sincerely support this🤠
If this is added then theres supposed to be counters for other tech trees right ? Like the T-14 and the KF-51, maybe the Black Eagle
What xd?
Some of it’s counterparts are already in game: The Leo 2A7s and Strv 122s.
1 Like
The SEP V3 have armor and era with hard kill aps, while those two tanks dont have that
the 2A7V and Strv 122 currently have armor that is far better than the majority of the other MBTs in game. Just add a version of the SEPv3 without trophy aps and boom, there you have a Leo 2A7/Strv 122 counterpart.
The SEPv3 and trophy aren’t one thing, there are more than enough pictures of SEPv3s without trophy mounted.
SEPv3 will not be a counterpart to Strv 122
Sure, but why should we have to grind another tank after the SEPv3, in order to get an APS when it should have been included on the SEPv2?
2 Likes
2 SEPv3s in a lineup is always better than 1.
Regardless. It was mostly to counter the point from the other guy that the SEPv3 having strong armor and APS would somehow make it overpowered against the 2A7/122 (which I heavily disagree with btw, SEPv3 is the best counterpart to these tanks that the US can get).
3 Likes
If Gaijin decides to model an actual Abrams correctly then its definitely going to be a counterpart, what i’m afraid of is they just copy-paste another garbage Abrams with a weaker turret ring and call it “New Abrams”
5 Likes
What? What ERA? Whats that? It gotta be broken if they add it to sep v3. Right? RIGHT?
“SEPv3 is needed for equality!!1!”
If the SEPv3 is needed to be equal, then we’re gonna need the 2A6A2, the T-72B2, and some other turn-of-the-century systems.
That’s not accurate. The M1A2 SEP v3 is a fully operational and widely fielded upgrade currently in service with the U.S. Army. In contrast, the T-14 Armata remains in limited production with no full-scale deployment, the KF-51 Panther is still a prototype, and the Black Eagle (Object 640) was only built as a prototype and never entered mass production or service.
1 Like