To beginn I have played the AIM a lot, I think it’s my 2nd or 3rd most played Vehicles and I have realized that it has pretty bad Armor. Maybe it’s the same with other U.S Tanks but I have researched a little bit and found a document on the Website of the Australian Government, reporting about the purchase of M1A1 Tanks, although it does not tell details about the AIM variant it does tell about mobility, Firepower and Armor of the Abrams which is pretty interesting. If anyone sees something relevant I would love to know. Thx
5 Likes
You’re not getting a better round and any sources for the m1a1 should translate to the AIM.
And why not? The KE-W is the export ammunition of the United States, and it is still an M829 but with tungsten alloy instead of depleted uranium.
1 Like
Ok, I resend my statement.
sorry for the mistake I just realised that it is mainly talking about the AIM variant
1 Like
np,
We could use the “support network centirc warfare” if Gajin ever adds that system. Other then that all the m1 function about the same: (excluding the ipm1) Not good armor coverage but hard spots here and there,
Good mobility, fast, good round (excluding the KEW which is an okay round for the battle rating), Good sights, Pore thermals, Ammo stowage is quite nice with 25 rounds in the ready rack and presently a 5 second reload.
in it of itself its a good tank, far out classing any minor nations tank and some what matching the leopards/T80s in some fields while failing in others.
Janes Land Warfare Afv 2021-2022
3 Likes
huh, neat.
To bad its classified.
Yeah I mean I’m not telling it’s bad but for beginners (excluding me) it’s not the best until you research the KE-W
1 Like
yeah, stock heatfs (yikes).