Your test does not invalidate my test; it is just another test.
The M1128 was not in optimal conditions; it was missing its engine and other mobility upgrades.
An ace crew is 100% plausible; you don’t want to use one.
I have not stated any incorrect vehicle statistics; any number has either come from you (PTWR), from my tests (0-50kph in 8.5 vs 8 seconds), or from Gaijin stat cards (weight, reload, etc).
The only way to know 100% is to actually test it, which you have not.
Once again, my test is not invalidated by yours, meaning the statistics I found are not factually incorrect, like you keep repeating.
The original 2S25 that entered service in 2007 was made from BMD-3 hulls, the newer ones post 2013 are BMD-4 hulls.
The BMD-4 was not originally a modernization of the BMD-3; it was a rearmed variant (only difference was the guns/FCS), which is why it was originally the BMD-3M. It is really just a sidegrade of the BMD-3, which is why some of the first production BMD-4s were simply modified BMD-3s. Newer BMD-4s are factory-built, but the og was just modified.
None that I can think of, but how much does it affect the M1128 vs the 2S25M? That’s what needs to be tested, not just their straight-line on a paved road.
What test, you quoted random values that I have proven to be impossible, there was no testing done.
It is in optimal conditions per the test being done.
As is the 2S25M, as I have already stated at length.
I don’t have a maxed, aced crew for either vehicle, if you are willing to foot the around 12000 GE I need to max out both crews and ace the vehicles I will preform the tests with maxed out, aced crews. Otherwise, as stated, removing crew skills is the only way to have an accurate comparison as I do not have equal quality crews for each vehicle, nor will I be paying money to have such be the case.
You outright have multiple times, and I have already debunked this exact speed statement, even spaded the M1128 cannot reach 50 kph in 8 seconds, per my testing such takes 11.54 seconds and this is with my actual maxed out US crew sporting no onboard ammo and no skirts, so even then you are lying through your teeth.
Such is even slower on unpaved roads taking 13.14 seconds to accelerate to 50 kph.
Meanwhile my not maxed crew and not spaded 2S25M reaches 50 kph in 9.45 seconds on paved roads and 10.03 seconds to 50 kph on the same offroad stretch so yes, you are very much so obviously lying.
I also ran these same exact tests on the far heavier 2S38, which, has the same engine pack and transmission as the 2S25M yet is 3.5 tons heavier and got 9.61 seconds for paved and 10.45 seconds unpaved, which is quite interesting given the 2S38 should be markedly slower due to an inferior PWTR but such is not the case.
Irrelevant yet I have done so above for you since you are so openly willing to ignore fact.
It very much so is, as you continue to cite blatantly false information as fact. Nothing you have said so far has been proven nor have you provided any evidence to back up your claims nor proven that you have done any testing at all to begin with, given this situation I will be posting the videos of my testing since I know that you wont accept fact unless someone beats you over the head with it.
I literally did test this. You also did, but got different results because you did it stock with level 1 crews. My test used level 150 aced crews with spaded vehicles, so don’t tell me it’s not impossible when you can’t even test it properly. Plus, I said it reaches it in 8.5 seconds, not 8.
Doing the test with level 0 crews and stock and/or spaded vehicles means that the only data accrued is data relevant solely to the vehicle itself. Using crews outside of level zero skill means that the crews level bonuses negatively impact the test because of the influence on it, meaning the data is contaminated and incorrect.
Which is, already as stated, just as valid of a test.
Yet you are still citing bunk.
Does not matter, either way its a lie, my current fastest achieved time with my spaded, and aced M1128 is 10.84 seconds to 50 kph, which is 27 knots in actual usable metrics of speed.
Here is said video as proof since you refuse to produce proof of your own.
I should also add that I disabled all non-mobility related upgrades on the M1128, you can see that all of them are present and accounted for on my mods tab however since I know you would try to strawman that I’m not using the proper M1128 fit.
I have also attached the aced driver driving skill and commander leadership skill below, as both are the only skills that come into play when dealing with mobility in game.
And finally the video, I should note, this is the absolute fastest time I was able of achieving.
As you can see, the cruise control is applied at 3.12 seconds and 27 knots is achieved at 13.96 seconds per my hand timing, meaning the absolute maximum attainable to 50 kph / 27 knot speed for the M1128 is 10.84 seconds.
So, unless you can break reality, 8.5 seconds to 27 knots / 50 kph is impossible to achieve in the M1128 in normal conditions beyond throwing it off a cliff which is not indicative of it’s performance as I can toss a T95 off a cliff and get it up to the same speed. I should also note that this is a completely unrealistic test as well given I had to remove all by 3 rounds out of the vehicle to get it to this speed, no tank in game would be running around with such a ammo load, but due to the fact that ammo weight is included in vehicle performance I had to remove such to even try to reach your impossible speed.
It’s not incorrect because the vehicle is meant to be played in that state (balancing). The data is also relevant as long as you use the same crew level, because all crew skills are the same, no matter what vehicle or nation you use.
CC2 is not the max cruise control, and it does actually make a difference to have it at max from the start. Try again next time. Your own “receipts” are factually incorrect. Get back to me when you can actually prove something.
Doing tests and actual in-match gameplay are not 1:1. You’re completely missing the forest for the trees and that’s why you can’t run a clean test for actual data points. It’s apparent you don’t know how, either.
Does not matter, the listed trial was to 50 kph or 27 knots, CC2 takes the stryker MGS to that speed thus max or 2 CC will provide the same exact outcome. CC2 indecently is actually quicker on average from my testing to 27 knots as it’s cruise speed is 34 knots and it does not continue to try to up shift during driving.
Man, all you know how to do is lie don’t you, such is very much so false in the case of the M1128’s 0 to 27 knot run up. But hey, I’m all for allowing you to keep making a fool of yourself.
So he we go again, 0 to 27 knots in 10.26 seconds, not 8, not 8.5, 10.26 seconds on max cruise control.
Whats next hoss, you’ve provided no proof to your claims and I’ve produced two videos which reinforce mine. Going to say the test area is bad? Or how about asking me to shoot backwards to give it a head start? Anything to further your bias?
It does matter, your first video with CC2 showed 13.96 according to you, whereas the second video with CCMAX showed 10.26. That is more than 2.5 seconds faster acceleration. If that is the “exact same outcome”, then the difference between the M1128 and the 2S25M acceleration is also negligible. You just proved yourself wrong in the same post you made that statement. We all know the M1128 doesn’t accelerate as fast as the 2S25M, but it’s not the boat you are trying to argue that it is.
