The Netherlands and Belgium both also had this vehicle in service, although theirs got replaced by the M109 (The Belgian ones were M109A4BE). (Keep in mind that both the Belgians and the Dutch had nucleair rounds as well for this system.):
Doesn’t look like it would fit well in the game. The howitzer and/or artillery pieces in game, for the most part, have turrets and half decent depression. Until we get some kind of long range fire artillery mechanic, I would say leave these large barrel artillery out of the game.
I would love to see it in the future if they can implement it though. Had a lot of fun with pieces like these in my WoT days. My statement is purely based on how it would fit game wise.
For the ammo issue, some tanks are already in game that cannot carry a lot of ammo IRL like the big gun version of the chi ha, possibly a compromise similar to that can be done to make it playable.
look like livepower not good
i will approve but not love it
become if your aim to other tank ahead of you shot
your will die of machine gun in your enemy
Oh my God. 203 mm cannon. I’m going to smash everything with it. I just don’t know if it will be in the game before 2300, that’s right, 200 years later.
Imma say no. Don’t get me wrong it’s a really cool vehicle but two rounds of ammunition and a two minute reload time… that just ain’t gonna work. At least something like the T93 has a few more rounds and a better reload and could be given the Sturmtiger treatment as an event vehicle with completely unrealistic reload rate. You couldn’t really do that for eight nations though.
Easy +1 since it can be added to multiple nations at once. Japan has also carried extra ammunition on the engine deck during exercises. This plus the ammo box mechanic should solve any issues with low ammo count. Still on your own for that reload though.
Put this on the technology tree. The Chinese mainland has another experimental model, the W-90 (more powerful than the M110A2) that can be placed on a non-tech tree.