NATO wont get something better therefore russia shouldnt get something better for balance
tor is ussr design and for some reason china gets it but russia always needs to be biased and get something better that is the best in the game
then you dont play toptier, in every match with russia there are atleast few kamovs
you cant even fly 1500km/h at ground level and not get spotted by one of those rat helis
2a7 armor is a joke anyways, russian bias IS real
here a pic of my 2a7 dying to a t80bvm HE shell hit in turret
a f*ing HE to strongest part of a7 armor
1 Like
There is overpressure mechanic in game, it’s what killed you
meahwhile BVM eating everything and not dying with its magic fake stats lego blocks
1 Like
Have you heard of Overpressure? It would have done the same to the T-80 had you shot it’s mantlet. And I’m sure someone can prove it.
1 Like
which is like 3 times smaller and harder to hit
t80bvm is just fake
just look how often it blocks shells side on with its magic era, shells go through driver,ammo and engine without detonating ammo, turret ring and its tracks blocking all damage,… and how easily a leopard dies when penetrated
not to mention kamovs tanking few AAMS and even apfsds flying without tail without issue
whenever I look at someones stats t80bvm has 60% winrate leo2a7 has 40% winrate
1 Like
lol You died to a missile that’s worse than an Igla.
and you are proving my point by having 60% wr on t80bvm in 124 battles
and 49,48% on m1a2 abrams and type 10 in comparable amount of battles
So your point is team skill is what causes win rates and not the tank itself.
M1A2 is a superior tank to T-80BVM, that’s obvious to everyone that isn’t Russian or loves Russia.
Also other vehicles that match BVM’s win rate on my profile:
Leopard 2PL, Bishma TWMP, Challenger 2, Challenger Mk3, M1A1 HC, M60 AMBT, ZTZ96A.
Guess you think Challenger Mk3 is as “OP” as T-80BVM.
Just cause my teams are bad doesn’t mean a tank is bad.
all of those vehicles arent 11.7, stop manipulating lol
I’m showing the state of russian bias playing on 11.7
EVERYONE has 60% wr on t80bvm, its straight up proof of russia having a much better lineup than any other country at 11.7
1 Like
There is no Russian bias.
It’s a myth made up by Russians to make themselves feel better about their mid vehicles.
2 Likes
So when are they fixing Stingers? Oh wait…
3 Likes
1- This is about Abrams.
2- Stingers are currently better than Igla by far.
2a- You proved no Russian bias by bringing up an American missile that’s better than Soviet equivalent.
The claim about Russian Bias was never siloed to some specific set of examples, and the claim of not existing is very broad and so easily disprovable statement, due to that fact.
If you needed one though compare how much they have resisted implementing any sort of improvement to the hull NERA array, and compare that to the planned IRST & HMD on the Yak-141, or various limited run / prototype Thermals being present on Whatever T-80 configuration that is relevant.
Ok? That doesn’t make them properly implemented.
So can you explain the following erroneous performance? Stingers don’t seem to be doing all to well.
Let alone the already linked explanation of the oversights made in the MANPADS Article? or their use of Soviets sources and flawed assumptions that with all of 10 minutes of looking were dispelled.
3 Likes
Obligatory Igla Moment
1 Like
You brought up Yak-141 thus your entire post is null and void.
“Yak-141 was introduced with the same exact rules as Kikka and Ho-229.” doesn’t prove anything other than Gaijin has been consistent with those rules for 12 years.
Again, Stinger isn’t Russian, so it can’t be used as proof.
Glad you agree with me that Stinger is currently incorrect though.
HESH and HEAT are receiving their own overpressure mechanics next patch.
You’ll be able to overpressure T-80BVM’s by hitting their turret fronts as well.
Also, personally I wouldn’t be so open about complaining about T-80BVM’s whilst using the (shared) best tank in the entire game, it’s a bit embarrassing.
Feel free to try that with me.
1 Like
You’re going to explain how right?
Established precedent would dictate that things don’t get planned features if they existed, I don’t know if you know this by the Yak-141 did actually take flight and was tested so isn’t covered under paper designs, its closer to a prototype like the M247.
I know, so why is its performance in game based of Russian sources as per the Devblog, then. Not actual documents
Source: “Техническая подготовка командира взвода ПЗРК 9К38 “Игла””, И. Акулов, В. Байдаков, А. Васильев, 2011.
Its about the seeming arbitrary double standard, that is quite easily observed in a few explicit instances.
3 Likes
Read entire posts before responding.
Cause you would know that 1: Yak-141 was not introduced in 2012 as you imply [it’d have to be added before Kikka and Ho-229 to “start” the precedent that Kikka and Ho-229 actually started.]
And 2: Kikka and Ho-229 introduced these rules, not Yak-141.
So you’re either posting lies, or genuinely believe Yak-141 was introduced to the game in 2012.
Neither makes you look good.