Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor - Transforming the Aerial Warfare

Game and top tier is much better suited to defend against Raptor and it’s AIM-120 than it was with F-14 and it’s AIM-54. That being said some decompression would be very good

1 Like

phoenix back then was even worse than it is now lol, plus 100m multipath rendered it useless. i think adding early f-22 with no hmd and only 6 total missiles would be fine, would be pretty balanced. especially considering how bad the aim120a/b is

4 Likes

Depending on the T-50 they add it would have much larger RCS

If you want 6 AMRAAM but no big performance increase it would have to be an early C model, like C-3 or C-4

Doesn’t really matter either. At 50 km engagements both of those should be detected by an AESA radar

1 Like

i said 6 total missiles because i was under the impression that the early f-22s can only carry 4 120a/bs and 2 9ms

1 Like

Oh my bad didn’t notice that, your right

1 Like

Exactly, so we should see two instead of one.

You still haven’t put any advantages and still didn’t respond to my question.
The R-73 beats the AIM-9M in every metric.
The T-50 would have 3D thrust vectoring with the R-73
The R-77-1 is just outright better than the AIM-120s
I imagine that it would have JHMCS which the raptor does not
And these are just a couple of things
Maws? Countermeasures?
Not to mention that it would have more R-77-1s if it would be added

no it wouldn’t. it can only carry 4 of them, and only on the outside lol, no internal ones. f-22 can carry 4 internally, su-57/t-50 can’t carry any r-77 that’s not r-77m internally

F-22 has these too tbf

i think the irccm on the 9m is better

maws basically the same, f-22 gets around double the cms of su-57

How many CM and what size are the Su-57?

They both have their strengths and weaknesses, the T-50/Su-57 have almost no countermeasures (x42 in total)
T-50 wouldn’t be able to carry the R-77-1 internally as they have grid fins.

42 large calibre, i think f-22 gets a bit more than 70 normal

1 Like

Not really. Try launching an archer from top-down or side aspect @ about 5km into a lawnmower, see how well this one goes. Both missile have uses, and I personally found NATO-style IRCCM way more useful given how often actual dogfights happen and how many multipathers there are.

1 Like

Yeah i think it was 72 normal CM, but LCM are much more effective so Su-57 effectively has the same or more CM

i forgot about external mounts, so early f-22 could carry 12x aim 120a + 2 9ms, while su-57 can carry 2x r-73s internally and 4x r-77-1 externally

12x is theoretical and I don’t remember it originally being a requirement like 4+2 loadout was

image

is this not a double rack 120 on the external pylons? i dont see why it wouldnt get it. either way, it carries the second most missiles of any 5th gen (j-20 has more, better missiles cause that thing is a beast lol - no gun tho)

1 Like