Does anyone here know if the LMUR on the dev was smokeless?
They already made up 8 LMURs on 28NM on dev
52M and 28NM FCS can handle only 4
4 Likes
Gets 16 on live because “reasons”
Do you have evidence of this?
Interesting… a british main/mains is/are b-hurt that GB didnt get heli with FnF and goes out of his way to nitpick, in multiple threads, at the new russian armament (the favoret punchingbag of the community since 2015)… pathetic
2 Likes
Presume this is directed at me, well for one we all want a realistic game?
Russia get away with murder when it comes to “balance”
Kh-38…
BUK 3M now apparently has a seeker that it shouldn’t have but having a SARHM seeker head would be bad for gameplay…
LMUR Helicopter cannot carry more than 4 Gaijin adds 8…why for balance.
Oh and Su-27SM and Su-30 carrying dual R-77 racks that physically wouldn’t fit.
Soyuz…lol
So while we all want a balanced fun game Russia currently are taking the pee. I can only hope the LMUR load out is dropped to the correct amount and Russian mains just need to accept realistic performances.
Like the rest of us have to
5 Likes
Nobody has been able to disprove it while there are sources saying it exists.
Still have yet to see evidence of this.
Physically couldn’t fit? What
2 Likes
I don’t know what purpose you were trying to serve by spreading the rumor. The Chinese community did not complain about JAGM MR. On the contrary, they welcomed the addition of such weapons. There are many American main players in the Chinese community. The complaints from the Chinese community concern the damage of the CM502KG and the additional four LMUR missiles, as this does not match the game’s authenticity claimed by GAIJIN.
Its not a rumor??? 4 forums were posted claiming the AGM 179 MR didnt exist and were calling for its removal.
They were removed because 2 of them got political
To be fair, nobody has shown any proof of more than two LMURs being carried at any one time by either the Havoc or Hokum.
Twin rails for R-77s were not even in existence at the time of the Su-27 and Su-30. Gaijin seemingly fudged it around to increase the missile count.
It would like giving a Lightning F3 BOL pylons. The plane didn’t have them, it never had them because they didn’t exist until waaaaay later.
1 Like
Can you still find posts complaining about AGM-179MR in the Chinese community now? This is merely an incidental impact regarding the quantity and damage claims of the CM502KG missile. Their statements involving politics are sufficient proof of this. If the Chinese community was truly dissatisfied with the AGM179MR, there would have been more than just 4 posts complaining. Moreover, the War Thunder Chinese forum is not the main activity platform for Chinese players. As a Chinese player myself, I am here to clear up your misunderstandings. English is not my native language, and my words might be a bit stiff. If there is any offense, please forgive me.
I just said they were taken down for politics and here some from another guy who was mentioning the same.
- his post got taken down here
1 Like
Dual pylons go between the engines the Su-35 is the only one compatible with the dual pylons due to the increased distance between the engines.
Also yet to see it proven, should be simple enough but even shared MIL Mi-28 export document shared in thia thread shows 2 per side.
BUK M3 there are literally a handful of references
No real data. Again should be easy to find it when we compare it so Pantsir, S-400/S-350 we can find data on the missiles.
Post a source on that. If anything. Su-35s should be the jet with problem to install a Dual pylon. Because AL-41 inlet diameter its like 30mm bigger compare to other flankers.
So post a source or a pic that Other Flankers with a pylon rate for 1500kg. Can’tt use the Dual pylon. Because dimension or weight are not a problem. Unless its some software problem.
Which would matter, except that the Su-35s are structurally different to other flankers.
Prove it.
Not sure if this really proves anything.
However something does catch my attention and that is R-74M.
Also I have no idea if it’s even worth reporting but
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ih9VOvY3471G
1 Like
Nitpick? By gains own standards 8 wouldn’t exist. They want proof and pictures of pylon configurations being possible usually. No such thing exist for lmur as never more than 4 are ever carried.
2 Likes