This is extremely dumb when non-napalm needs 5.
and there are some nations which cannot access it at all.
I DIDN’T CHOOSE TO PLAY THEM, for Christ’s sake.
The day when I talisman Tonka GR.1, there was no jets which can carry napalm in GB TT.
:/
Even today, the only napalm-carrier in WHOLE GB TT is MiG-21Bison, which is from India and accessible by payment.
They are even worse than napalm-bombing fighters.
Both sides are not helpful in the current ARB meta.
But at least napalm bombers are not violating EULA. TK player does.
They literally hate every ground grinder.
I even got TKed once before because [I brought a Tornado IDS into their sacred fighter-heaven ARB].
Maybe it was blaspermecy. :|
I meant, napalm bombs need some adjustment because it is broken now.
it really needs to get revamp on mechanism.
but ‘removing it completely’ is not a good idea if we thinks about historical loadout side.
That is why I am not supporting this idea even though I hates [MiG-23ML with napalm] in same level of our baroness maggie.
I mean tbf look at this way, Fire does damage overtime and does hella lot of damage when uncontained compared to bombs which does 1 big damage because only explosion
It’s kind of modeled in game on how Napalm doesn’t insta kill but damages overtime
Yes. It is true, Napalm don’t instant-kill the base, it burns half down with flame.
But it burns way too fast compared to its non-burning counterpart’s weight.
I seriously don’t get this community. You lot cried for years about Napalm being useless, but now you lot cry it’s too strong. How about we make everything OP.
AFAIK, Tonka don’t have the ability to use a napalm bomb. (I might be wrong.)
And RAF never kept napalm bombs in their arsenal after the 1950s, even though they kept the rights to use and the capability to make napalm. :/
It’s been downhill since they nerfed rockets. I’m so glad I did Sweden when I did, because the grind for it was dreadful enough as it is, the rockets were the only thing keeping it from being any worse.
It does. People cried for a rocket nerd and a napalm buff. When it finally came, majority of the people I saw were praising the end of “rocket exploiters” and napalm finally being useful. Now a year later, napalm needs a nerf because people in a slower aircraft are complaining about not being able to hit bases as fast as… faster aircrafts. I mean, I can complain about the Wyvern and the XP for America being too fast, especially since all we get are slow bombers at the 4.0-6.0 BRs.
No…? Very few ppl ever wanted napalm to be better except for usage in GRB against tanks and stuff like that. They also weren’t the same ppl asking for a rocket nerf.
Exactly, Realistic bombing gives you more rewards than anything else. Hell, Sin gives you like 11k in a premium every 15 minutes. I could make more by doing that in Realistic.
Japan don’t need it. They have the rocket bombing strat
French have the F-104G (the Mirage F1C is so bad at bombing that I prefer suffering with the 530f)
Sweden yeah, other than A32A which is a tier 6 and can’t research top tier
British have the mig 21 bison with napalms (hidden option)