it strongly depends which br you are plying, you need a br which is played much more than many br´s as the full downtier option, aand then you need luck that not that many play the br´s which are 0.3-1 br higher…
not really dude… sure that can influence it a bit… but literally FULL down tiers happen about 10% of games… meaning 1 out of 10 games, is a full down tier, on average
Whereas full up tiers are about 70% of games
I play low br for fun when im extremely frustrated from 7.0-12.0 ground sure i dont have planes highest plane i have is a premium which is the DO335B2 and even so i rarely ever use my premium 5.7 german lineup due to the constant full uptiers thats beaides the point. I only go into low br brackets due to its a way i unwind from the stresses of hackers(which BVVD is the most common name i see hacking and im talking about both on my team and enemy team viewing replays) and tryhards who try way way way way way too hard at this game be even more sweaty than the sweatiest of all call of duty players which imo is pathetic if you tryhards actually tried at your lives maybe this game would actually be fun but anything above 8.0 br is more of a frustrating chore than actual fun goes and this is due to panzies using primarily overpoweredly broken tanks helis and aircraft which primarily are RUSSIAN which tells me that gaijin doesnt play their game at all and those livestreams that show the tanks we get as devstreams are private matches they are not actual matches therefore gaijin devs who show off the new shit dont play their own game
its true that downtiers are rare but you can really influence it by doing this
Every full down tier is a full up tier by definition.
So what does this mean if put together?
First of all, we have to leave the “me” perspective. If I play 1.0, I will experience only full up tiers, but that does not mean that only full up tiers happen.
For the statement of Drakunite to be true, games would on average have to contain 10% top tier, 70% bottom tier and 20% middle tiers. We can all check if this is true - not from the tier we end up in but from the scoreboard of all participants.
Now if our subjective “me” perspective does not agree to the objective match composition analysis, why could that be?
Confirmation bias comes to mind first. You only notice when you are low tier.
But it could also be subjective reasons. I know the game loves to assign you the same map type if you quit early. Perhaps it also does this to down tier quitters? Or very good players?
We also have “wrong analysis” as an option, because players identify BRs wrong or don’t understand the downtiering in air arcade.
Because “I” and “me” are not the entire population in play - it is entirely possible for “me” to have 100% uptiers while the whole population hads 50/50
Thank you for reiterating my point ;-)
I also dont like level 100 guys on low battles because i find a lot of “GOOD” level 100 players seal-clubbing, and people is fine with that but im not, but we can’t do shit beucase “level ≠ skill” so… if you can’'t fight em, join em? (high levels on low brs i mean) so thats what i do sometimes.
I remember times where i wanted to play low tiers to enjoy some vehicles but i felt bad facing mostly new players.
till i took a new mission: kill the seal-clubbers.
Check profile, if level 100 with top tier vehicles and its doing good on the match or tryharding, i will try to hunt it. Its the way i find fun :p
sometimes you find some level 100 actually having fun with low tiers and not tryharding, like playing some weird tank or flying on a PO-2, i like when it happens
I’m level 100
I’ve been playing for many years
I have grinded my way through the majority of tech trees to high BRs, and in the US’s case, to top tech tree in ground
I never played Japan much
My Japanese tanks are not out of Rank I and very low Rank II
It’s going to happen if I want to continue grinding Japan and not be one of those people who buys a top tier premium
It can’t be helped
100 isn’t special anyway
This is a non-issue
You are welcome - although I think I made it a little more clearly :)
it happens that you dont have every techtree(I only have 4 air to toptier and maybe 2 for ground)…
and it maybe that I didnt play all the lowtier planes/tanks…
you are pretty much level100 when you grinded 1-2 techtrees to rank8 so dont think lvl100´s are veterans who have all planes/tanks its just wrong
I didn’t say EVERY but I have PLENTY through MOST. Don’t twist things.
My point is being level 100 in low BR battles is nothing for anyone to complain about.
Stat Shark is toxic. You had no reason hyperbolize what I said and then “Correct” me on it.
sry my braindead brain meant the toptier nations for me, and I only use statshark when a gy is only yapping without proof to check if he even knows what he is on about
ok
should have corrected it, sorry if it came the wrong way(I also have to play lowtier sometimes even tho hightier is more fun for me)
No worries I’m a spaz
Why play high tier games when it’s full of spawn campers and ODL. Better games are in the lower tier battles.
Missing the entire fucking point
lvl 100 against lvl 1s is an issue 100% and it’s gajins fault for making it so, just don’t defend it cause it’s litterally unfair