Don’t worry we’re just making fun of Lolman who has never used the ATGMs on the SU-25 and keeps making stuff up on the fly.
4 Likes
Hmm I dont recall claiming that a SLAH missile is a MCLOS one.
Nice job posting a MCLOS missile my guy, very nice.
Nope.
Lolman345 claimed the Su-25 had IRST tracking, so now everyone is putting the boot in.
2 Likes
Nice job posting a MCLOS missile my guy, very nice.
Clearly not, it’s tracking the target that I point it to. That’s the reasoning you were using for the SU-25 with “tracking”.
1 Like
And where did I ever say that? Please highlight to me where I said anything of the such or do you want to keep putting words in my mouth.
And? The bullpup is not a SLAH missile it is MCLOS one is an automatic guidance system one is manual, then again you can garner that from the name of the guidance alone cant you.
You aint seen nothing yet muttbros our 20km unguided mavericks
5 Likes
And? The bullpup is not a SLAH missile it is MCLOS one is an automatic guidance system one is manual, then again you can garner that from the name of the guidance alone cant you.
But you said the SU-25 ATGMs track a target though? (before you edited your posts) My bullpups are tracking the target too by the same reasoning.
Also did you see that sick 7km bullpup kill? Clearly proves how overpowered they are and how good they are at standoff range. Obviously comparable to a maverick.
2 Likes
I did not even before I fixed the grammar of my post, but please keep trying these futile attempts to gaslight me.
Is firing at a target 12.36km away - “You aint seen nothing yet muttbros our 20km unguided mavericks”.
1 Like
I did not even before I fixed the grammar of my post, but please keep trying these futile attempts to gaslight me.
You did and we all seen it. You must believe we’re all as silly as you are.
3 Likes
you even posted the spreadsheet that states 24km against the ground
dude take a break you are buggin
2 Likes
No way the subsonic AGM-65 HAS TRAVEL TIME NO WAY!?!?!?!?! I NEVER KNEW THIS
i fired at 20km the maverick is just slow lol
4 Likes
This thread has been a pleasure, but I’ll have to retire for the moment.
At least Lolman has earned his name today. May his cope continue until tomorrow so I may resume.
2 Likes
Sure my guy, believe what you want.
I was not aware that the ground is a enemy vehicle and a tangible target, I can launch the KH-25ML at a range greater than 6 miles because the seeker lacks a maximum tracking range, heck, if we really wanted to drop it from orbit it could in theory track out to 100km due to that value not being defined, would it be effective, lol no its got a 45 second guidance duration which would be the limiting factor.
Stay mad my guy, watching 3 people grasp at straws with no actual tangible arguments is quite funny to me.
Im sorry bro i found the Su-25 with Auto tracking
Ignore the br and name clearly must be a bug its definitely the 10.0 one
3 Likes
Since the laser tracking range on them is 10km maximum, somehow I doubt that.
The guidance range being undefined just means that particular field is undefined. Meaning the game falls back to either a default or hardcoded limit. Which is 10km.
1 Like
He gave you a constructive answer. What are you looking for, an echochamber?
2 Likes
Its a launch system limitation, the hellfire has a similar feature where the targeting system will not like launching past 8km even though it is coded to have guidance out to 12km. You can edge both of them far past their launch limitations by firing within their launch parameters and dragging the missile farther along as the aircraft closes the distance to the designation.
It is far easier to do this with the hellfires due to their 30 second break lock time compared to the 2 second time that the KH-25ML has.
And you still wouldn’t see a target with the Su-25 because it has no zoom, that’s why both you complaining about the 10.0 Su-25 and 20km+ Mavs are absurd. The Kh-25s etc. are just bad weapon choices until the MiG-27K/Su-25T, their carriers have no zoom to pick out targets and you’re incredibly limited to flying almost directly at the target less you lose track of the missile, they’re arguably worse than Bullpups as at least you can maneuver after launching to avoid SPAA fire.
No
Destroying an ADATS in test flight with a target marker highlighting it is not representative of the Su-25/Su-22 in an actual game
Gave it some testing in the Su-39 and MiG-27K, and launching at 10km, and slowly moving it to the 11km target, the Kh-25ML explodes in midair about 1km before reaching the target. Doesn’t lose tracking, its still tracking the laser point, it just times out.
So no, I don’t think the Kh-25ML will be hitting 100km targets.
edit - if you’re at high altitude and high speed (near supersonic), you can just barely reach the 11km. But that’s pushing it for range.
edit2- out of a dozen or so tests, I haven’t been able to replicate the one 11km hit I got. So there’s a good chance I messed up the timings and launched too late that one time.
1 Like
Once battery runs out missiles explode in game, iirc its been like this forever