You never said it had IRST?
Its now been edited, originally said
3 Likes
Honestly. I think the US is fine.
With 3 major exceptiion
-
Top tier ground compression. Just like all nations, 11.3s that are actually 11.3 worthy suffer greatly against the 11.7s that really should be more like 12.3. This is not a US only problem, but the US is one of 7 nations that probably does actually lack a 12.3 worthy MBT. Only nations that have one currently are Sweden, Germany and Russia. Italy I think will be joining that list next major though.
-
SPAA gaps. This again is not a unique issue. Britain has just as large holes, if not larger. But many nations suffer from a lack of adequate SPAA at many BRs
-
ADATS. Britain shares this pain. A dedicated top tier SPAA is needed ASAP rather than the ATGM launcher we both currently have. Israel also needs a top tier SAM.
Whilst yes the US can get more IFVs and MBTs. So does every nation. Britain and Israel are finally getting our first 10.0+ IFV this update. France needs to be next
1 Like
Watching him edit his posts in real time as he realises he keeps getting BTFO is pretty funny.
3 Likes
Yes, IRST-auto tracker is not a form of missile guidance, its a part of the plane not the missile.
Nor did I say the SU-25 had a IRST-auto tracker.
Editing your post everytime you get proven wrong is embarrassing
3 Likes
I can’t believe how handheld the scimitar is, gets 7km tracking ATGMs at 8.7.
1 Like
Is that an IRST auto-tracker at 8.7???
2 Likes
Yeah man, just like the one on the SU-25.
2 Likes
What tracking? They are bullpups
is that on dev server?
That’s the joke
1 Like
Ah… Thank you
1 Like
Don’t worry we’re just making fun of Lolman who has never used the ATGMs on the SU-25 and keeps making stuff up on the fly.
4 Likes
Hmm I dont recall claiming that a SLAH missile is a MCLOS one.
Nice job posting a MCLOS missile my guy, very nice.
Nope.
Lolman345 claimed the Su-25 had IRST tracking, so now everyone is putting the boot in.
2 Likes
Nice job posting a MCLOS missile my guy, very nice.
Clearly not, it’s tracking the target that I point it to. That’s the reasoning you were using for the SU-25 with “tracking”.
1 Like
And where did I ever say that? Please highlight to me where I said anything of the such or do you want to keep putting words in my mouth.
And? The bullpup is not a SLAH missile it is MCLOS one is an automatic guidance system one is manual, then again you can garner that from the name of the guidance alone cant you.
You aint seen nothing yet muttbros our 20km unguided mavericks
5 Likes
And? The bullpup is not a SLAH missile it is MCLOS one is an automatic guidance system one is manual, then again you can garner that from the name of the guidance alone cant you.
But you said the SU-25 ATGMs track a target though? (before you edited your posts) My bullpups are tracking the target too by the same reasoning.
Also did you see that sick 7km bullpup kill? Clearly proves how overpowered they are and how good they are at standoff range. Obviously comparable to a maverick.
2 Likes
I did not even before I fixed the grammar of my post, but please keep trying these futile attempts to gaslight me.
Is firing at a target 12.36km away - “You aint seen nothing yet muttbros our 20km unguided mavericks”.
1 Like
I did not even before I fixed the grammar of my post, but please keep trying these futile attempts to gaslight me.
You did and we all seen it. You must believe we’re all as silly as you are.
3 Likes