Lets talk about the state of Germany

Whether a specific nation used the shell is irrelevant to them (See: ammunition on mKPz M47G, DM 53 on Strv 122, etc.) aslong as the technical compatability can be proven (which it has been in this case)

Fair enough, more so worried gaijin would still find some way to argue against it. Though I guess if they don’t want it, they’ll just keep it in accepted limbo

Sweden, UK, US etc… they all get German ammo they never used irl. So why not the other way around for once.

I’m not saying I don’t want that, I’m more so just worried gaijin will just backpedal because they themselves don’t want it.

I doubt they will do it. It might upset US players.

1 Like

Giving stab to Marder is in fact an upgrade

While also losing the milan (at least it’s not present in the image). This “upgrade” may as well be at the same or a lower br

Ps. I was corrected, im just blind

You can literally see the Milan rack in the photo. You understand the Milan doesn’t just sit on the rack the whole time irl like it does in game. They are loaded independently by panzergrenadiers

Uh, guess im blind then

1 Like

I might be blind but where?
Even looking at other LWT-3 pictures I have, I can’t quite seem to see it.








It’s the most popular game mode in WT…

that’s true i find it weird why not adding any on these in the list like the missing so many.

Germany need new fighters like :
Me 262 HG I
Me 262 HG II this fighter could be good against Su-9 and kika unlike normal Me 262
Fw 190 D-14 better than Fw 190 D-13 thanks to new engines
Fw 190 D-11
Me 262 A-1/U5 ( just a normal Me 262 with 6 mk 108 instead of basic 4 )
BF 109 K-6
Bf 109 K-14 am not sure if was built
Heinkel He 177 B-5 ( better in every way than the normal He 177 A-5 in game )
Heinkel He 177 A-6, A-7 am not sure of the A-6 was built but the A-7 would be also good bomber if snail added the better engines.
many Ar 234 C-3N / C-5 / C-6 / C-7

it’s sad Ar 234 with m151 pod was premium and germany got no new or updated Ar 234 models for old Ar 234 😭

2 Likes

Evidence for it is kinda all over the place but most put it as not built or unable to prove

true it’s like the Fw 190 D-15 with DB 603EB engines it’s hard to find trusted sources.

yeah I don’t understand why the ussr gets 1 of 1 ulta rare planes just get added to the tt but German or others are missing, yak3u for example

1 Like

when was the last time germany got a a good fight in WWII or new jet it was years ago

so many suggestion and options available but no none get chosen or get added after many years.

even bombers Germany could have really good bombers best one is He 177 A-5 they could get

all of them are suggested and passed.

He 277 / Junkers Ju 390 / Ju 287
image

Ju 488 V3
the most pretty bomber from all of them very handsome bomber 😻
image

germany need new bombers like the Ju 288c is only for GE and He 177 don’t have their SC 2500 bombs which is weird to.

Dornier Do 317 B

and good also the Ar 440 A

am so excited to see this added it one the strongest DB 603 engines the DB 603G

i really hope they foucs again on WWII past years main focus was cold war + like girl WWII players exist to confused

i hope i be alive when these Vehicles be added would be so awesome to see them

2 Likes

Some time later and uuh, I would just like to add something rather amusing;

{4C489CEB-D665-4237-BB94-B16C09137FD4}

What conclusions you draw from this is up to you :)

Aside from the ERA part, the data also shows that DM 53’s ballistics and thus penetration are underperforming;

Rh 120 L/55 Cannon, V0 = 1750m/s:
{D2DAD1B2-754F-4657-8E1E-966397993D0F}

1km, 0° Obliquity, Ve = 1695m/s, Line-Of-Sight Perforation:
{C69DC7D1-C8A0-4FFD-AA52-64198818E164}

Spoiler: full calc

{D79CAF94-C0D7-475A-8591-044CC9EFD2FA}

1km, 60° Obliquity, Ve = 1695m/s, Line-Of-Sight Perforation:
{AD9B35D6-B891-4A2D-A296-4B1822E51B47}
Corresponding Plate-Thickness perforated: 369.7mm

Spoiler: full calc

{58DE07F9-F67F-4EB2-9588-5F9CB131A622}


Rh 120 L/44 Cannon, V0 = 1670m/s;
{55274959-EF20-4634-A5C6-A86A78DF3F5F}

1km, 0° Obliquity, Ve = 1615m/s, Line-Of-Sight Perforation:
{62DDAD57-F144-4E98-B5F8-AE636B78FA9C}

Spoiler: full calc

{244A3AAA-B4E4-4B9F-8447-7EB567EDA504}

1km, 60° Obliquity, Ve = 1615m/s, Line-Of-Sight Perforation:
{3CEA1B68-9714-465F-8AB5-677DACAFC61A}
Corresponding Plate-Thickness perforated: 351.5mm

Spoiler: full calc

{5FC5FDDA-DD9B-4B08-8BC0-E327A0B04025}

Note: Dimensions for the penetrator are the same as those used ingame currently.

Using the ingame ballistics-chart, we can see that the residual-velocity at 1km is;
Too low by 10m/s on L/55 (Should be 1695m/s Ve)
{9AAF25D8-E4A7-4F75-B249-9278B95BDE76}
Too low by 7m/s on L/44 (Should be 1615m/s Ve)
{67D73DC4-E616-46CC-B9EE-93081E222498}

3 Likes

Well… not that much later and it got even better :)
https://web.archive.org/web/20150205001451/http://defmunintl.com/KE_DM63.html



uh huh… double-reactive armour… and the method of defeating it ;)

Surely they just didnt know T-80U existed by then, they only did firing trials against it ~2 decades earlier.

Brochure is from February 2014 or earlier as it’s the first archival-date of this brochure.

Edit:
More “clear marketing lies” for y’all

{82C85F4E-5010-4242-9799-D0033FAC5FE4}

{08D0532F-CACA-4399-95A8-0442F0E583C2}


Spoiler: Embed Press-Release

grafik

Surely this means it will fail to defeat K5 2km below it’s effective combat-range, right? :)

5 Likes

Marketing lie

3 Likes