In the mean time Canadians rampaging
Mbts i would agree.
Dont know enough about spaa performance.
Jaguar maybe a tad bit better then puma.
France just has definitly the better air support.
Rafale (that being said hammers are getting mach limited)
Not even mentioning ah64. They got a straight upgrade over the tiger uht wrongly with the tiger hac.
And for all sense and purposes their own tiger had would still perform better then h145m.
Since gajin doesnt even qanna add the door gunners
That ones questionable and discussable.
The leclercs dead for all sense and purposes it not getting further developed.
There 1 in service variant left with the xlr.
surely there’s at least one off arms exposition tanks, not really the most realistic but far better than copy paste, and doesn’t the uae operate a few hundred don’t they have any upgrades
Dunno about uae.
There is the lelcerc evolution in that case.
But that opens another can of worms trough the new 120 ascalon cannon and so on.
Questionable if it was operatable
It was shown of together with the leopard 2 arc 3.0 for germany , which was fully functional
Wasnt the leclerc azur literaly on of the uae configuratkons?
Really depends on what you’re shooting at. They are both borderline useless against a semi competent LDIRCM heli pilot. The Iris is better against planes but the SAMP is so much more consistent when it comes to intercepting munition.
honestly seems pretty sad as a Dutch fan ngl, having to pay for every unique Benelux vehicle while our non-unique vehicles are just skins for countries that use the exact same Dutch vehicles. As the Finnish 2A6s are purchased surplus 2A6NLs, while the actual 2A6NL would be reduced to a skin for it. Same with stuff like the Fokker 21 being a Dutch aircraft being reduced to an skin for an exported model. I’d actually like to see Dutch stuff ingame as actual Dutch vehicles, not just our equipment being represented through other countries’ armies because they bought it from us. The main fix should just be not pairing the Benelux with France for obvious reasons or another system for subtrees entirely like subtree folders.
Decided I’d play the maus for a change since I never really touch it.
Was pleasantly surprised to see a full downtier in the first game.
Was less pleasantly surprised when I got ended up getting one shot by a laser range finding autoloading time travelling HE slinger. Remembered rapidly why I don’t play heavy tanks around that BR.
What is lower br than a maus with all of those?
I just don’t care that much, but maybe I just lack nationalism or something. Most stuff, especially the lower tier stuff that would be most unique is pretty affordable.
However I’m not a hardline opponent to the sub tree. The cat is out of the bag already and isn’t going back in, so I mighr as well use our dutch vehicles while they are in the game. (Although not many of them are worth using in game), only the CV9035NL, NF-5A and F-16s for the higher tier stuff imo.
PZH2000 is the same BR as the maus and italy has one.
Bro the 2a7 has worse mobility, worse anti air Machine Gun, worse armour, and a worse reload to the bvm
The 2A7 does not have worse mobility than the BVM.
61 km/h to bvm 70 km/h
I knew you were going to cherrypick top speed.
Mobility encompasses more than just top speed.
Leopard 2A7 has a significantly better reverse speed at almost 3x the top speed of the BVM.
That’s far more useful than 9km/h extra forward speed.
As a side note:
-
worse anti air Machine Gun - Really? You’re not killing any aircraft at top tier with your roof MG regardless of whether or not it’s 12.7mm or 7.62mm.
-
worse reload - Both have a 6s reload when aced. You would be right if you said the 2A7 had a worse reload if crew skills are not maxed or if the loader is injured.
-
worse armour - Half truth, the BVM has the stronger side and frontal glacis armour due to ERA shenanigans but the 2A7 has the better turret armour and has spall liners to help too.
Meanwhile you neglected to mention that the 2A7 has:
- An objectively superior round with DM53
- Almost double the gun depression
- Spall liners & blowout panels
Small correction:
Regardless of crew skill level BVM can reload 6 second consistently (as long as you pick stock sabot).
Lmao
Only if the BVM uses 3BM42-2.
With 3BM60 the BVM has a 6.4 second reload.
Now compare the other mobility aspects. I agree than the BVM is more mobile going forward, but that isn’t the only aspect of mobility.
Only if the BVM uses 3BM42-2.
With 3BM60 the BVM has a 6.4 second reload.
Interesting, didn’t know this.
Realistically the only thing that makes BVM appear strong is the inconsistently applicable (rng wohoo) post-penetration*-survivability thats caused by the various artifical buffs made to its damage-model. (tbf that summarizes pretty much the entirety of russian top-tier tanks)