what i would rather see but i know gaijin its gonna overtier its the KF-41 in the brochure wich contains the early KF-41 equipped with unmanned turret 30-35 mm cannon depending on choice and up to 4 atgm’s ready to fire
True, but considering how Gaijin tends to severely uptier anything with missiles despite the effectivness of them, perhaps it would be better to add the early prototype without any. And leave the missile uptier to the already-implemented one we have in Hungary.
also another thing i remember is the book of rules for gaijin addition of vehicles, for such cases it went like this vehicle build by (german company), went to australia and trialed but not adopted in this case it goes to the country of origin or country who made it, there are cases where vehicles are build and trialed by same country or under collab and get added to such country like the Boxer Cockerill 3105
this one has missiles, lemme show u the fun pic, that area where the smoke launchers are located fold outwards and reveals the missiles, that’s why i said it has 4 ready to fire
Well, it would be nice if Gaijin actually had a proper rulebook for vehicle implementation, because they seem to contradict themselves quite often such as with the AMX-30 Super that was brought up earlier in this thread.
Yeah I kind of forgot that the Lynx uses fold-out launchers, I guess that there probably isn’t a cannon-only version then.
i mean DF-105 was also part of this recently being added in 2 different countries
1 Like
Having played the KF41, if I actuslly mained a tech tree I would fight harder for my tree not to get a KF41 than the other way around.
It’s such a pos lol.
Doesn’t mean that people dont want it. Trust me people want vehilces even if they are bad just because its a part of the nation and their history of vehicles. The CV9030 in its current BR and state is easily the worst IFV at 9.3 yet i can tell you right now there a few swiss who want it on Germany.
Im short for time so im only gonna answer this for the time. Ive made my thoughts clear on the Mi-28A and T 80U. Both never should have been added. The Mi-28 could’ve been a Danish Fennec (wouldn’t have earned gaijin money because it offers nothing to the TT) as for the T 80U plenty of vehicles could’ve taken its place. Its seems very evident gaijin wanted people to but them together as it makes the most sense to add them like that. You’re also willingly ignoring the AHS which itself is also a trial vehicle. Which i have also stated should bw removed. You could leave sweden with only the 9.7 helicopters and then gaijin would never make money on them. Add eithwr a Norwegian or Swedish UH-60 which irl dont use hellfire but can mount them but only 4 missiles and people will still cry that they got missiles they dont use even if its a trash helicopter at 11.0 or 10.3 sweden animosity is a fairly prevalent thing but thats a whole other can of worms i have no interest in discussing.
1 Like
Forgot about that one, I don’t support its presence the same as any other copy paste trial vehicle.
All imported australian vehicles are in their developer nation. UK only has native developed australian vehicles, the f-111F doesnt count since it has officialy been stated to be only a pity F-111K replacement since that isnt able to be implemented but was requested.
Following all functions the australian KF41 goes to germany.
This is not true. There is no standard KF41.
Its only showed of as what is possible.
All current users/intrested.
Hungary,US,Australia,Italy have it modified to their specification. There is no standard KF41.
There are differences,but that doesnt out it into the UK tree. Australia had no hand in the development themself. Australia gave specificstion in the competition and every nation developed from there themself. The KF41 you have shown was developed and built in germany and then shipped to australia to compete.