I mean a good example is the Trinity SPAA. Its a joint project of Bofors and the Swiss but who gets it? The vehicle was assembled and did almost all of its testing and assembly in sweden.
Imo both should get it. Its a joint project but you have people who want it for one nation exclusively. Same deal with the begleitpanzer ect ect. People will argue that giving it to both would take the unique aspect of the vehicle away.
Realistically you’re going to make one group upset either way
This is why we can’t have nice things.
That is utterly ridiculous
There is clear evidence of France conducting use of the TRIGAT LR in testing:
“In service” has never been a mandatory requirement for consideration.
Reports are welcome with clear evidence to show spesifically how the TRIGAT should be performing differently: Community Bug Reporting System
Isnt that a secondary source?
Yeah I get exactly what you mean .
I do wanna see the game balanced and nations get their own indigenious equipment xd
Its one such example of a source I had to hand. There are many others out there. France has very clearly tested and fired TRIGAT.
Just a disclaimer that was a genuine question as I know next to nothing about these helicopters.
Just making sure, so if i can compile a report of various news reports and the likes, on say the chieftains armerment or the Shir 2 armerment It could work as a report?
As ive been focuing a lot on trying to locate both primary sources and books, which are unfortunately hidden behind either a payment or long wait times.
Thanks in advance.
The sourcing requirements for reports are available here: Community Bug Reporting System
What is appropriate source material for historical issues?
OEM Manuals (primary source):User manuals, repair manuals, factory manuals, operating manuals, technical manuals etc.Single source is required (preferred source).
Authored works (secondary source):Reference books on collections of vehicles/aircraft/ships (‘coffee table books’), biographies, specialist books, “expert” opinion publications, industry magazines etc.At least two unrelated sources required.
You need to provide the following information about the source:
- Title and if applicable: publication date, document number, ISBN;
- Author or organisation;
- Image of the cover;
- Images of all the referenced pages and their page numbers;
- References for photographs;
Roger appreciate it.
I am aware that you nudged the reports for the UHT (Outer Rockets and Missing Mistral)
but why the heck isnt this allready fixed, like sure there are reports which are more important, but these reports are 2 years old and the HAC gets both on day 1
I take it that the swiss f18 is a much later and more advanced model than the ones we got this update for not just the USA but sweden as well.
Because that is going to be the ONLY acceptable excuse for germany being left out. And any other nation that used it.
A lot of points are still true, especially the completely nonsensical justification for not giving us the lynx
Yeah. Not like the dutch should have gone to Germany based on the logic subtrees are usually assigned under…
Well thats a whole different discussion.
Why is India in Britains tree?
Thats the question. Gajin granted France the German Top heli just as TT unit. While vice verca Ger got the French counterpart added as useless prem without proper ordnance.
Who is buying a heli with laser lock ATGMs? It might be somewhat OK with long range and superfast Vikhrs, but Hellifre…oh dear.
the answer is quite simple
Same reason as for why english is an official state language there
Nope, it’s not. Its the the same as the Finnish hornet but with HMD
Oh good, yeah i can already hear people saying theres no bias. And gaijin saying the german one wasnt ready yet.
And i almost forgot, why is gaijin giving japanese mains so much time to grab the r2y2s.
When they removed the german tanks they said “german tech tree improvements” and yoinked all of them. No multi month greif period no real warning just gone.
Extremely fair and balanced.
Given why they didn’t add MLU since it was too similar to the US hornet and it would take away from the unique vehicles the US has the Swiss Hornet cant come. Its literally the same as the current US Model in terms of HMD and A2G. Unless the Swiss made some big change like different wing designs it would fall into the category of being too similar.
So anti german bias. Hasnt been an issue for other copy paste vehicles.