i’d rather something more useful like the Bradley CTAS
exactly right
isn’t there an aussie one made by south korea not boxer but a different ifv
ah no thats the IFV competition the K-21 redback won against the KF41.
Boxers are a seperate vehicle for transportation
ah ok
As (K21) Redback
Boxer CRV
The thing that annoys me , is that some Brits are demanding the rejected KF-41 variant for UK and dont wanna give it to germany
1 Like
if was rejected its a grey area
didnt enter australian service and is a german export.
Checks out for implementation for germany. Thats why people denied the Hungarian one. Because that one is in Hungarian service
it would be similar to that American leopard i guess
American leopard ???
Event vehicle Leopard 2AV
The test one the Germans sent its a event vehicle
ah the 2av nvm then :D
I wanted to write an bug report about Tiger UHT recieving ahisotrical nerfs since Gaijin assumed it used the Strix sight instead of the Osiris. After gathering enough evidence I decided to check the source they posted in preliminary changes and yes indeed it does say Tigers use the Strix sight (Pic 1.)
Unfortunatly literaly 1 page before it states that the Tiger UHT uses Osiris (Pic 2.)
How is this even possible?? I am so done with this company…
2 Likes
welp report it and be done with it…
added the information quickly myself
1 Like
Last I knew they were working on TopOwl for the Tigers, AH-1Z, and Rooivalk.
I’m unsure on the technology integration of the UHT in comparison though.
When I play the Sweden T-80U or the british T-90 “Bishma” against russia I feel inmortal, 7 of 10 shots do nothing to me, due to the lack of aiming to weakspots. And then here you see “russian mains” saying the same bs of “lEaRn To PlAy AnD aIm To ThE wEaK sPoTs” when they can´t even aim (some of them, plobably the majority but you know what I mean) because you only want equality and you´r favorite vehicle added with his real charasteristics not invented armour or bad modeled…