It’s running the same composite as Strv 122B at the least.
Whether that’s correct or not IDK.
Its not correct but at least a totally unacceptable weakspot is removed.
1 Like
Really someone need to tell him that in this kind of job “You can’t have biases toward other” he can have bias all he want in his private time noone care or stop him but not toward players that they are customers of the game
1 Like
Pretty funny inaccuracy i’ve found lol.
One of the heavy side-skirts is 50mm, all the other are 100mm:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZrqFLxdtspys
He’s been the constant pain for the majority of France as well.
If there was a way to organize that doesn’t mean everyone involved would get banned I’d gladly welcome it. Because calling out a moderator for their poor performance and lack of communication is considered a bad thing for the community to do.
1 Like
Not fixed, but the UFP is now universally protected at ~530mm RHAe vs KE (still doesn’t shatter APFSDS), and overall, still worse there than normal Leopard 2s without any add-ons.
i am taking bets if they gonna make it 50mm for all or 100m
Also, wouldn’t the Leopard 2a7V gunner zoom be more than 12x? it uses the same attica sight as the Puma, and as such should have 14.7x zoom instead
Puma uses a newer sight if I remember correctly, so no.
But overall yeah, if the game had digital zoom, we’d have 50x zoom.
After all i see it pretty much make sense why he act like that pointing out his poor performance for me nothing wrong it’s good since know they know the problem and they know where to fix
But well i guess i should stop now
ahh I see, Leopard uses Attica but the Puma uses Peri. My bad
No. PERI is the sight, ATTICA is the thermal camera.
2A7V uses PERI R17A3, Puma uses PERI RTWL if I remember correctly, or maybe PERI R17A4… not sure, would have to check.
1 Like
if i am right leo 2a7hu used the same sight as the Puma as well
Ye, RTWL.
Also not implemented yea
Yea, the Puma’s gunner sight is called EOTS iirc. The 2A7V’s is the EMES 15A2 with ATTICA GL.
1 Like
particularly since the reasoning was “armor is not final”
Sure, but thats irrelevant to if the armor is right or wrong, and NOT bug reporting it leads to more chances of the armor ending up as final…
1 Like
They have to be doing this to 7V since they aren’t ready yet to go above 11.7.
What’s their excuse for the T-90M then and its 7m thick turret armor, 3m thick hull armor, and void shields to absorb spall to such a degree that DM53 can rip the seat out from under the gunner and commander and not even give the guys a skin rash?
9 Likes