By the way, since they’ve now implemented and modeled the sabot of APFSDS, I believe that they’re not too far away from fixing the AHEAD ammo found on the Puma and Lynx. All that needs to be changed is the amount of projectiles, spread, and to have it time dependent based on the ranges/times calculated with IRST.
If AHEAD was modeled properly it would likely crash the game. Like how SPAA like the gepard and m163 almost did back in the day.
Well shit… And the idiots running the show refuse to just change it to a proxy round…
1 Like
I think its like 400 pellets in each AHEAD round. Obviously dont need that many in WT, just buff it a little it.
When I see that I have to deal with little things like 4 km/h more top speed for Leopard 2 in the issue reports. 🥴
What happens when i find bigger problems?
Do I then have to deliver a whole tank? 🙄
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/qXpFaGSHhow6
1 Like
Pahahaha ofc it’s TrickZZter, the developer’s favorite puppy
Sometimes it’s better not to look at a good old book.
Things are there in black and white for eternity.
Next Problem found for Swedish vehicle:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XtYhTKvQWODr
I feel the marder 2 despite having a better cannon would end up being worse than the puma. As you can see the marder 2 has a 2 nan crewed turret. Presenting a significant risk in war thunder.
Sure
https://depatisnet.dpma.de/DepatisNet/depatisnet?action=pdf&docid=DE000002851205C2&xxxfull=1
https://depatisnet.dpma.de/DepatisNet/depatisnet?action=pdf&docid=DE000002655520C3&xxxfull=1
https://depatisnet.dpma.de/DepatisNet/depatisnet?action=pdf&docid=DE000002741789C1&xxxfull=1
https://depatisnet.dpma.de/DepatisNet/depatisnet?action=pdf&docid=GB000002179519A&xxxfull=1
1 Like
162 in the 30mm one
The 35mm has an option for 400
3 Likes
Thanks!
Still a lot.
i am salivating for the day we get actual AHEAD and not this butchered version
Edit: Found the 30mm document again
4 Likes
that ones already reported and gajin is aware of it, was a suggestion from the old forum
Huh… I’ll leave it up and hopefully they’ll have an answer this time. Old forum reports were purged, right?
No, on top of that pass to devs goes to an internal file system unconnected to everything else.
oh…
Yeah companies relying on forums or a bug report site for all their data can be an issue.
Every company I’ve come across with a suggestion system has the passed suggestions in an internal system that they can access from any computer. Far easier to search through it that way.
1 Like
You can save yourself, the Gaijin support is just ridiculous.
My report with a reference to the source and everything necessary from a specialist book was rejected on the grounds:
Quote:
"What is appropriate source material for historical issues?
OEM Manuals (primary source): User manuals, repair manuals, factory manuals, operating manuals, technical manuals etc. Single source is required (preferred source).
Authored works (secondary source): Reference books on collections of vehicles/aircraft/ships ('coffee table books'), biographies, specialist books, "expert" opinion publications, industry magazines etc. At least two unrelated sources required.
Please be reminded that Wikipedia or other private websites are not considered reliable sources.
You need to provide the following information about the source:
Title and if applicable: publication date, document number, ISBN.
Author or organisation
Image of the cover
Images of all the referenced pages and their page numbers
References for photographs
What is appropriate source material for historical issues?
OEM Manuals (primary source): User manuals, repair manuals, factory manuals, operating manuals, technical manuals etc. Single source is required (preferred source).
Authored works (secondary source): Reference books on collections of vehicles/aircraft/ships ('coffee table books'), biographies, specialist books, "expert" opinion publications, industry magazines etc. At least two unrelated sources required.
Please be reminded that Wikipedia or other private websites are not considered reliable sources.
You need to provide the following information about the source:
Title and if applicable: publication date, document number, ISBN.
Author or organisation
Image of the cover
Images of all the referenced pages and their page numbers
References for photographs
1 Like