Chinese players are very concerned about the level change and have a lot of opinions, and like Italy, France and Israel, we have huge doubts about the current outcome. For myself, there were 94 and 73 likes for the request for VT4 and ZTZ99A, but like many others, there was no response, why? If you don’t want to listen to your players, what’s the use of us doing that?
20 Likes
Asking for a reduction in reload time is a cliché, and even if this is not discussed, the armor that has repeatedly gone wrong is disappointing and suspicious, especially since the ZTZ99A has been “fixed” but still remains wrong, and the VT4’s armor is also a big problem that has passed but has not responded. Why?
11 Likes
Please don’t talk to me about “there are tanks that are worse”, comparing who is worse will not produce good results, and will make Gaijin make even worse tanks. It’s such a simple matter to reduce the reload time or add better shells! Even if you have to talk about bad tanks, then the VT4A1 is a rotten thing in the “bad guys”, there are no advantages in maneuverability, firepower and protection, I don’t understand how gaijin is so resistant to strengthening the VT4A1.
12 Likes
Just saying, even though you may not get any feedback to your opinions, it doesn’t mean it’s not noticed.
Are these bug reports you are mentioning? As that would be something to hit up the technical moderators about. And from there you need the right sources, and information to be supplied.
2 Likes
nobody tell blud about the crew placement or the fact there’s an AMMO CAROUSEL behind the vt4 lfp
16 Likes
the M1 will live shots to the LFP, the VT-4A1 will die from any green area
6 Likes
That’s not true, lol.
1 Like
direct middle for both
VT-4A1 will take much more damage than an M1 will if both are shot in the LFP
4 Likes
…And so instead of campaigning for both sides to work together to fix armor issues you immediately turn it into a victim contest.
16 Likes
for this question，Chinese players have made a collection of mistakes, and I understand that it is unrealistic to ask for those requests to be fulfilled immediately, but I don’t think there is a problem with some comments that can be implemented immediately and not excessively
8 Likes
Bro, there’s no point in discussing who’s worse, why can’t we get better together? As far as I know, a lot of United States faction players are also working on Abrams
10 Likes
Forget about Abrams’ lower frontal plate, it’s a trap, though you can knockout the driver and engine, the crew is a such position to survive, and if you shoot the corners the internal armor plates and fuel tank will eat the spalling.
1 Like
I was the one typing the feedback on VT-4A1, I think I made an error, because I forgot the hyphen - and said VT4A1 instead of VT-4A1 (I later corrected it but too late). So if the developers searched for VT-4A1 they may have gotten no results.
However, I don’t think it would be fully explained, as there were multiple other comments about VT-4A1, ZTZ-99A, and WZ1001 that gained many tens of likes. But Gaijin didn’t respond to any of them, nor did Gaijin even acknowledge them. However, Gaijin acknowledged player feedback on many other vehicles with much less likes combined.
Therefore there is definitely still a large problem.
2 Likes
xd, I don’t think it’s a big deal, I’m typing in VTA41 as well
1 Like
I too wish for more engagement on those reports, and overall in various submissions by actual Gaijin staff and devs.
And yes, it doesn’t matter if things take time, all it is wanted is for some ‘Noted’ or ‘Interesting’, or even a ‘I’ll just ping XXX to come have a look at this’.
Lost in translation is a common thing though, and translators really do not do people justice.
The issue posted by Chinese players is not beyond reality But you need two or more publicly available materials
China has a high level of confidentiality, and players can only obtain data that is closest to reality through calculations
But Gaijin doesn’t want to accept players’ opinions. I think we can delete the Chinese line
A game that is both “real” and “unreal”, with 5s for balance adjustment and 7.1s for never changing. Asking questions is not a bug
Sorry for the translation
1 Like
that kind of shot on those tanks is almost always 1 shot so doesnt really mater
yes
