The rounds can still cook off. It wouldn’t change anything in game
1 Like
I would like to point out that in the recent dev server update, the Leopard 2A8’s gun depression was reduced from 9° to 7.4°. This arbitrary nerf is historically inaccurate and logically inconsistent. Meanwhile, the frontal armor of the Leopard 2A8 remains easily penetrable, and these armor issues have been completely ignored. Furthermore, my issue tracker access was inexplicably banned despite having never submitted a single issue. This is a blatant attempt to suppress community feedback.
Also, please do not attack Russian players. They are just scapegoats of Gaijin’s attempt to divide the community. We should not have infighting. We need to stand together and push back against Gaijin’s broken balancing logic and censorship.
1 Like
Did you spam the report or say anything bad?
If you really didnt break the rules, go seek help
Didnt somebody bug reported evrything the 2A8 is missing and got accepted?
Let us remeber, this is the first week of the dev server. Anything can change. Just wait
That’s the most ridiculous part. I never spammed anything. I literally just upvoted a few Leopard 2A8 bug reports, and I got banned for it! The issue tracker is completely broken. It was never about giving players democracy; it’s just to make players feel like they have democracy.
Completely lie btw lmao at best you see 10mm more pen from dm73 🤷♀️ it’s not a big improvement
With a total of 0 tanks able to use it…
1 Like
wouldnt it matter tho in regards of modelling ammo explosions? if dm63 would be modelled correctly, the propellant couldnt be set off, you could take full ammo, plus the ammo in the first stage rack also wouldnt explode in the classical sense. You basically couldnt die to ammo racks.
and that would be a bit strong atm…nice tho if youre the one in the leo2a8 and every other leo using dm63.
Sure youd still mostly die through your crew being killed, but leo2a7 is already among the top 2 or 3 best tanks in game…and now people want trophy leo 2a8, with better armor AND dm63 so unkillable through ammo racks? Thats not going well i can tell u that right now.
They should add aps leo, sure, improved leo 2 versions are always cool to have and germany is really not doing well winrate wise atm (though the tanks arent the reason for that and just adding more of the already very good tanks also wont solve that). finally fix its armor would be way more welcome than adding dm63 and also make it invulnerabe to ammo racks.
Apparently, grasping that mine was just an example to illustrate a concept is too difficult. Besides, the SEPv3 wasn’t there yesterday, but it is today; the 2A8 wasn’t there yesterday, but it is today; who knows, maybe tomorrow they’ll add the T-14; you have no way of knowing! XD
Look for help, either by someone here on the forum or support
That’s not my understanding… please provide some sources regarding this. In any case, whether it’s 5, 10, 20, or 50 mm, it still represents an increase. Furthermore, you aren’t taking into account impact angles or the loss of kinetic energy, factors for which the DM73 round and the high-pressure L55A1 cannon were specifically designed.
Surely dm53 firing at 50m/s is a huge improvement and would be meta breaking ammo.
It’s a increase of basically nothing. 🤷♀️It’s a irrelevant ammo type for the game
30m/s* the dm53 in game has a mv of 1750m/s
My bad lol looked at dm63A1
1 Like
30 m/s more if using a long barrel is irrilevant for you? Would likely lead to increased penetration of the 7-8% (700mm instead of 650) and a better loss of kinetic energy. If for you is ok i have nothing to say.
You know that we have a calculator that allow us to do direct comparisons? The extra 30 m/s just increase the penetration by 12mm, thats negligible
Btw the 7-8% increase is not penetration.
Because how gaijin calculator works it’s like a incredibly of 10 not 50