Leopard 2A7V- The most underperforming tank in the entire game

The leopard 2A7/HU in the is the most underperforming tank in the entire game. Its basically a fictional tank based on what gaijin thinks it should have. Gajijn refuses to ad D-tech in game for no reason and they make the most technologically advanced leopard every made have the worst turret armor in the game!



Do anyone really believe that the 2a7 has 400mm of effective armor on the left cheek? Its missing HUNDREDS of mm of armor all over the tanks package. Its armor package seems like a badly modeld 1991 leopard 2 IVT prototype. The armor package it has in game i essentially from the 1980’s when the tank is from 2020!

The 2A7V in game has up to 100mm worse of kinetic protection all around than the strv122 series tanks. Even doe the 2a7v should use D-Tech and the strv122 uses C-tech while it also shouldn’t. The 2a7v armor is even worse than C-tech! It basically uses the 2a4’s B-tech armor!!

Seems like i gotta edit my post beacuse people clearly dont get what im trying to say. its the most underperforming tank in the game COMPARED TO IS HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

1 Like

2A7V is pretty good IMO but i would still like to see some buff for it

5 Likes

The 2a7V is from 2014. But yea I’m hoping we see 123A soon and gajin realized they have the 2a7s very wrong

It’s a amazing tank but the armour is just wrong

1 Like

ofcourse it good, but it would be even better if it actually was right

clearly working as intended, wdym


(same happens on the other side too because there is a random hole (entire vertical-line basically) in the armour array, this issue does not happen on other Leopard 2A5/6 versions btw)

Also happens on the other side of the turret

2 Likes

not even close to the most underperforming

1 Like

Leopard 2A7 is from 2014, not the 2A7V.

It is.

I don’t know of any other MBT that’s missing as much as 800mm of protection across major surfaces.

1 Like

Opening Statshark is free.

3 Likes

objectively a skill issue

I think they mean from a in-game performance -vs- historical performance (armour model, acceleration, penetration, etc.) point of view.

I also think OP is copying my comments regarding this vehicle, because some stuff they’ve said is near word-for-word what I;ve said in the past.

1 Like

using your brain is free

is it a skill issue that im complaning about the in-game performance does not match the historical performance?

give it 5sec reload speed

Not needed. Just the armour being fixed is all but that’ll never happen

no, but calling it the most underperforming MBT at top tier, when it’s actually one of the best performing MBTs, is

I do think it should be upgraded to better match its estimated real life performance but that should only come with a BR increase and better vehicles from other nations that are on par with it

+300mm KE for the left cheek close to gun shield at normal.
+120mm KE for right cheek at normal.
+150mm KE for right cheek at 20° angle of attack.
+850mm(!!!) CE for right cheek at 20° angle of attack.
+450mm CE for left cheek at normal.
+200mm CE for right turret side at 20° angle of attack.
+190mm KE for special armour skirt near front.
+190mm KE for glacis plate at normal.
+350mm CE for glacis plate at normal.

Acceleration to 55 km/h reduced by 2 seconds.

DM53 penetration from 653 > 685mm.

Maybe so, but that’s misrepresentation, not underperformance tbh. Besides fundamentally what does it matter? With such vast improvements it would be at a higher BR, and top tier MBTs are basically fantasy in the game in my view.

That’s… Odd. I mean, you usually have great takes don’t get me wrong, but ctrl + c and ctrl + v…

So that’s two free things you ain’t doing.

1 Like

The Leopard 2 is a pretty balanced tank, with decent mobility, the firepower of a NATO 120mm tank gun, and somewhat unreliable protection. I think the problem with the Leopard 2 lies in the fictional D armor. Gaijin really thinks D armor is like overpowered composite armor rather than just an overall armor layer, and the turret protection is handled the same way—Gaijin figures it should be like that instead of filling it out according to the actual data.

im sorry not trying to be rude but i have no clue who you are. Everyone can have opinions?? Were do i copy your comment? Ive posted tons of stuff about 2a7 before?