Repairs are global for everyone, I wouldn’t mind like a slight buff or nerf to tanks depending on their repair accessibility.
Israel had good armor at the start, but players complained a lot sonit got nerfed, they weigh the same but have less armor
Yea but its not realistic
It was just an exmple that wt isnt only about realisem or it will be unbalance asf
Yea its bs
More so when the tank weight even more then gaijin says
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
DM53 wouldn’t go through T-90M or BVM UFPs.
It already perforates K5 T-72B array, but War Thunder treats barely perforating as bouncing.
@Debuffer
Russian tanks do not have equivalent rounds.
Keep demanding double standards all you want.
@ARK_BOI
War Thunder is a simulation, and is highly realistic. The most realistic tank combat game on computers at the moment.
Get used to that my dude. The Russian tree is already pretty much at its zenith and relies on some dubious stuff while Nato has still a long way to go with actual in service equipment.
Balance will always be the first priority and that will either mean gimp western equipment or leave the russians behind in BR. Which they wont do to their most played tree
1 Like
Compare to other tank games i find it pretty realistic
Tell me about it
Look at my poor spyder
Its missing derby er for no reason and unlike 2a7 it needs it
And dont let me start on what they did to python 5
Cuz it will be op
Its not that germnay suffers compare to other nation its that russia is op compare to the rest
Im not against it in fact i allready suggested it long ago
For irist it can be buffed only with counter ammunitions which i think will come in the next update now when most nation has normal spaas
maybe a little but not considering a realistic oh another advertisement is about well document vehicle as i remember lol my a*s they just pop-up marketing lie and refuse to make historical accurate stinger that people give document around 22G and it still 13G wasting people effort and time for nothing something i have no idea i should cry or laugh at their incompetency maybe i should did both lol
1 Like
Yeah, I get the “OP” concern, but Russia and other nations already have FAF missiles on their jets, Kh-29T, Kh-38, Mavericks… Brimstone being modeled as fire-and-forget wouldn’t be some special buff, it would just bring Germany/UK up to the same standard. Balance can always be handled with ammo count or cost, not by stripping the missile of its defining feature.
2 Likes
There’s something about Gaijin and Israel, I saw some Spyder gameplay and it was the saddest thing I saw, insane deadzone and broken missiles
1 Like
@ARK_BOI
Being historical doesnt mean they ahould add evrything they can and make chaos
If something is wrong even if its weak thats a diffrent problem
@Debuffer
Im with u on that inalso thinks ef2k should get like 6-8 fnf brimstones
1 Like
Hmmm You might want to check the M1A2s and their ammo again in game lmao.
4 Likes
well, if Gaijin competent enough they can adjust to make it balance but like I said being competent is not Gaijin’s trait.
1 Like
Theoretically they could balance everything over BR but at some point that would mean that some tech trees would outpace the others and Gaijin wants every tree to be at the same br level at the top
Given that ground battles is more compressed than a can of tuna, addition like these has no room. Leopard 2A7V is the most versatile main battle rank currently having the best balance between armor, mobility and firepower at top tier when compared to others,
Ammunition, reload speed and few other characteristics like battle rating is added, removed or modified to match balancing reasons, DM73 is probably not going to be added when a proper vehicle to match its capabilities is added and/or ground battles is properly decompressed.
I’m full in new addition even if they risk game balances, I’m urging for new additions for ground that isn’t directly related to airplanes (i.e. ‘new-generation anti-air systems’), but considering we have no information that vehicles like Object 195 even T-14 Armata that may be enough for DM73 deal with no issues is coming to the game, this only is a wish rather than something realistic.
2 Likes
You would just have historically accurate 2A7s at their own BR range fighting nothing else.
Then suddenly when people realize they wouldn’t just be able to stomp they would probably want more balance lol.
By the look of it they just can’t decide to go realistic according to document or make game balance they trying to mix both (didn’t do the good job at it too) and this is the mess they’ve got into.
It’s also worth pointing out that the 3BM60 is Russia’s best NON-DU round, the 3BM59 is the same round but made from DU giving it about 30mm more pen on 60deg @ 2000m. not a massive improvement, but something.
1 Like
you could probably get some properly modeled other NATO tanks in a similar BR but true it would be just blufor on blufor violence.
@ARK_BOI
They always go balance first. Theres a reason why every 12.0 tank is gimped as hell except for the russian ones.
Just don’t tell me that the 2a7 has a problem penetrating Russian MBTs.