List updated
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/NA0K1ImdXii7
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cwGGtg6UHyBY
Both reported.
Added
any more interesting info about the 2A7V?
@NoodleCup31 I will speak as my friend @ЧВК_Вагнер. It’s about leopard 2a7v ammunition. We must have alternative HE ammo RH-31 ( usual HE, without any stuffs)
So hope on your assistance…
Nice job
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HhaQbyiiIo3Y
Turret ring sticking out of the hull/turret sitting too high reported.
About DM73 for leopard 2a7v
if it uses the same proppelant as DM63 it would mean it will be impossible to ammorack since thats what DM63 was tested for
It uses different propellant to achieve higher muzzle velocities.
uses different propellant but if im not wrong it still has the properties of the propellant found on the DM63
Correct;
SCBD = no boom, basically.
“None of the sources have protection values or information about inner structure”
Well NO SH*T!
Almost like those are classified information lmao…
From this table gaijin posted in 2021 and which is regularly updated. Left is CE, right is KE.
damn why making the 2A7V worse in kinetic than STRV122?
Remember Sweden is a minor nation they need better statistics to be played than the original vehicles on Germany (Even if they have the same or worse armour)
damn this gaijin logics tho
HOLY JESUS
That rates the 2A7V hull at 80mm KE LESS than the Strv 122.
It should be about 100mm MORE!
I saw on some sort of bug report that the Leopard 2s armor was underperforming, and the same was for the STRVs. Apparently, it should be 100-200mm thicker, though it was a long time ago I saw it
No, that was incorrect.
122 and 2A5 etc. have the same internal composite armor.
The 2A7V however should have massively improved hull armor below the addon.
The 122s and 2A5 only have the same turret armour to be fair. The hull of the 2A5 is weaker (and they could have made it even weaker if they wanted to).