Leopard 2A7V / 2A7HU discussion & bugs

Then my hopes are also not exactly high for the 2A7V getting fixed anytime soon

So show a doc say otherwise then… because until now thats the best source with actual numbers and even has the info on what sources it used… because of if you are assuming we are already full os that b* here with gaijin and their assumptions

Just because there is no other source available doesn’t mean an inaccurate source should be used.

By your logic I could just take a napkin, write that the Leopard 2A7V UFP is, let’s say, ~100mm vs KE, get Scholz’s personal signature on it and submit that as a source to Gaijin.

So show me a proof that my source is inaccurate,simple like that

You mean like the inaccuracies that @Flame2512 already pointed out?

He pointed out of his brain,same like you… literally expecting to go like “you are inaccurate because im assuming it”…the gaijin way…

Sure. This is from one of the declassified reports on the British Chieftain replacement programme. The context is that after evaluating the currently available “off the shelf” tanks: Challenger 1, M1A1, Leopard 2A4 (c-tech hull) the MOD have determined they do not meet the UK’s requirement. So the UK is justified in looking at more expensive options (Challenger 2, M1A2, Leopard 2 Improved), which were still under development at the time.


The armour figures given in “Armor Technology” by Paul Lakowski are all far above the real values from when Britain evaluated those tanks.

He also claims that the Challenger 2 uses DU armour, which is a claim I’ve not seen anywhere else before.

5 Likes

Your about to get game ended by flame 😂

2 Likes

Give to make USA mains mad /j

1 Like

Funnily these documents of yours could be used to give 2A5 & 2A6 quite a hefty buff since they do have C-tech hulls, and neither provides 435mm in the 34 degree arc lol, although that’s more so due to Gaijin’s absolute inability to somehow model heavy side-skirts properly on anything that isn’t Russian.

10 Likes

2 months short of 2 years now.

Im really hoping its taking this long to add the Puma S1 cuz theyre doing a full rework, but im not holding my breath…

1 Like

it could be done yes but it wont as Germany ingame mostly gets Base Versions while a certain other nation even gets stuff that was tested on 2-4 Tanks

rubber fabric > HHA + rubber + HHA obviously

NATO only knows how to make armor with the effectiveness of foam, and get worse at making armor every year, didnt you know?

1 Like

armor you mean Tin Cans on Tracks cause only mother russia can built armor remember the Sekrit Documents Comrade

1 Like

don’t forget the egg cartons called relic :D

1 Like

They are spacers… How often do we have to bring that up.
But i do agree, those bags do take way too much dmg for what they are…

Oh boy, its never “out of his brain” haha.

1 Like

i love people like you spreading missinformation and being overall braindead

1 Like

thats not missinformation, there is documented cases where russians didnt have relik available anymore and filled them with egg cartons

That being said, apparently the egg cartons are supposed to work as spacers

How is this supposed to be innapropiate lol

6 Likes

Rubber…